He said that he would add extra length to be buried in the spring, and to do the hook up in spring would be extra charge in the spring.
A lot of people really don't like the idea of a wood stove on a rental. I under stand that they will need to keep the fire going, but from what I can figure out from all the reading is that if the boiler goes out it won't freeze as long as the circulation pump still works. And this makes sense to me since the gas furnace will be there to jump back in the game if the wood boiler stops or slows down. If the wood boiler stops getting fed wood as long as the water is circulated then the heat exchanger would just work in reverse, heating the wood boiler. So if the renters do not with to take the time to load the furnace then they can pay for the gas. Also until just 10 or 15 years ago a majority of people in the up use to burn wood in there indoor wood boiler, so most people prefer it over the cost of gas. It wasn't until insurance companies started bending people over if they even had a fire place in there home.
I would love also to insulate the house better. I totally agree that this needs to be done and I'm going to look into that. One big project at a time. I am no where near rich so I have to pick my battles. But the renters moving in now, the husband works in the wood so he gets wood super cheap and has a couple boys to feed the stove. I talked to the wife about it and she knows and likes outdoor wood boilers.
Thanks for all the advice on renters guys I appreciate it, But what about my original question? How does that quote sound? High, low?
A lot of people really don't like the idea of a wood stove on a rental. I under stand that they will need to keep the fire going, but from what I can figure out from all the reading is that if the boiler goes out it won't freeze as long as the circulation pump still works. And this makes sense to me since the gas furnace will be there to jump back in the game if the wood boiler stops or slows down. If the wood boiler stops getting fed wood as long as the water is circulated then the heat exchanger would just work in reverse, heating the wood boiler. So if the renters do not with to take the time to load the furnace then they can pay for the gas. Also until just 10 or 15 years ago a majority of people in the up use to burn wood in there indoor wood boiler, so most people prefer it over the cost of gas. It wasn't until insurance companies started bending people over if they even had a fire place in there home.
I would love also to insulate the house better. I totally agree that this needs to be done and I'm going to look into that. One big project at a time. I am no where near rich so I have to pick my battles. But the renters moving in now, the husband works in the wood so he gets wood super cheap and has a couple boys to feed the stove. I talked to the wife about it and she knows and likes outdoor wood boilers.
Thanks for all the advice on renters guys I appreciate it, But what about my original question? How does that quote sound? High, low?