Two years ago I split two cords of wood by hand because I couldn't afford oil. I stopped burning wood after three weeks due to a problem with the woodstove. The woodstove is now fixed, but this year I can afford to heat with oil.
I'm not young and the splitting cost me three months of hard labor. Now I'm thinking about all the work and inconvenience involved in burning wood---bringing the wood from the wood pile to the garage, resplitting there for kindling and smaller pieces, carrying it upstairs several times a day, maintaining the fire all day every day for the next four months. Plus the risk of a fire.
I'm wondering if I should sell the wood and go back to oil. I would probably keep a half a cord for power outages. Dry wood is about $450 a cord delivered in my area, but I can't deliver, so perhaps $350 a cord or $525 for one and a half cords. The same BTUs in oil would cost about $940, so oil is a lot more expensive than wood in my area.
However, I work at home, so the amount of time I spend processing wood and maintaining the fire is literally time away from my paid job. I hate to lose the three months I spent splitting this wood, but I'm wondering if it would make more sense to sell it. The last time I ended up with too much split wood it rotted and I lost a lot of it.
Arguments in favor of keeping and burning the wood:
I'm not young and the splitting cost me three months of hard labor. Now I'm thinking about all the work and inconvenience involved in burning wood---bringing the wood from the wood pile to the garage, resplitting there for kindling and smaller pieces, carrying it upstairs several times a day, maintaining the fire all day every day for the next four months. Plus the risk of a fire.
I'm wondering if I should sell the wood and go back to oil. I would probably keep a half a cord for power outages. Dry wood is about $450 a cord delivered in my area, but I can't deliver, so perhaps $350 a cord or $525 for one and a half cords. The same BTUs in oil would cost about $940, so oil is a lot more expensive than wood in my area.
However, I work at home, so the amount of time I spend processing wood and maintaining the fire is literally time away from my paid job. I hate to lose the three months I spent splitting this wood, but I'm wondering if it would make more sense to sell it. The last time I ended up with too much split wood it rotted and I lost a lot of it.
Arguments in favor of keeping and burning the wood:
- It's an investment and protection against future power outages, loss of income, and large increases in the cost of oil
- Burning wood reduces wear and tear on the oil burner
- The wood was free, mostly harvested from my property
Last edited: