Just another boring steel stove.
There is no such thing. Big honkin steel stoves rule!
Just another boring steel stove.
It's not like the 30 is one of "those" good looking stove, I seldom hear about people knocking them. I'm thinking it also has to do with the price point along with the "steel" stove looks.
Im sure i could get Past the looks of this stove if i lived in ALASKA. Even a choosing a wife there ,you would have to base it on more than good looks.When I bought mine I had considered a nice looking soapstone stove.
I'm glad I don't have to mess around with the stove numerous times during the day. I'm glad I can pretty much just throw standard length wood into it and let it do it's thing. I'm glad it holds several weeks worth of ash.
If you want to see "ugly" I'd have to get pics of the stove my folks used for nearly 30 years to heat their place. It was homebuilt out of an old 275gal heating oil tank.
I spoke with someone at Blaze King this morning, who was very surprised I knew about their new cast stove (Ashford 30, 2.75 cu.ft.). They refuted the reports that it will be available this fall, stating they won't be releasing any info on this stove until their next trade show in March, 2013.
Gamma...I hope you don't think the same way about you hubby lolI am intrigued by the Bk's....would love to test drive one for a month....
I really don't care what it looks like as long as I get the performance outta it that I want....which is......
a "mean heating machine" that I do not have to babysit.... >:-(
I don't think the BK's are that ugly....
think of it this way....sometimes you go on a date with someone that you do not find that attractive at first, but, after spending some time with the person you find them way more attractive....
This is a pretty good way to put it! :lol:
Similar to when you date really good looking people sure they look great on the outside but man do a lot of them turn out to be a pain in the butt. Kinda like the pain the butt some of these "good" looking stoves cause with their wanting to be loaded every 8 hours or less or only wanting a few pieces or they get too hot.
I'll tell you what's a pain in the butt is every 2 years you having to spend 500 dollars on a catalyst.
I'll tell you what's a pain in the butt is every 2 years you having to spend 500 dollars on a catalyst.
The cat for the Princess is 245, I want you to actually be informed the next time you want to talk bad about a stove you've never burned.
Your just mad cause you have a stove called a PRINCESS... see what I mean?The cat for the Princess is 245, I want you to actually be informed the next time you want to talk bad about a stove you've never burned.
How often is that $245 spent?
Spill it, man. What do you know?
How often is that $245 spent?
I find the unofficial poll results to be.... as expected.
Of course, but I'm not sure what point has been proven. You don't need to see a Jotul, Lopi, or even a VC in person to see they're beautiful stoves. I've seen Rosie O'Donnel and Magdalena Wrobel only in pictures, but I can tell the difference between the two.
I hear some of you state that you need to dry your wood for 2-3 years. That's fine and dandy for some of you who have plenty of property to store that much wood for that length of time. This is why I think alot of stove company's are not carrying the blaze king or the likes of stoves with catalytic converters. I do believe that wetter wood might be the guilty culprit along with the higher temps and incorrect operation of the system is causing these catalysts to go out prematurely. Local stores quit carrying them due to these catalysts going out or is not as efficient after a couple of years...and there saying there not 250 dollars a pop. There more in the 400 dollar range. If I can't dry my wood to a point where it can burn within a year... I can't do it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.