And most people don't care in the least about a few percentage points one way or another. They simply want a stove that fits their budget and will work for them.
Stove efficiency calculation
- Thread starter nortcan
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil. -
Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
That is your own opinion, and as I can read your not open mind comments, you never understoud the reason of my question.
Ok take the baffle out of any stove and measure the average stove top temps over the duration of the burn. Then compare it to the average with the baffle in place. It will be much higher with the baffle plain and simple. Yes without tge baffle you will probably get a higher peak but it will be short lived
No apparently we don't understand the reason for your question. Because it has been answered and that doesn't seem to be enough.
I just talked about YOU. Looks like you dont like or understand my Québec location ? Or maybe you're too busy with your algebra and trigo...LOL
What does your location have to do with the meaning or testing procedure for stove efficiencies? I certainly don't dislike your location I have no reason to. It is irrelevant to our discussion.
I agree that variation operation (i.e. differences from the testing procedures) will make a large difference in the numbers. Wood loading packing, moisture content, time of charring phase, flue height, outside weather conditions including air pressure, home tightness, etc. etc.
I agree thus that testing is not giving numbers that are what you would get if you measured heat flows at home.
They are meant for govt imposed standards (epa, hence independent testing!), and many mfgs do pick the best numbers to advertise. (As in all ads...)
The point is that you can compare stoves based on these test results as the only difference is the stove, not all the other conditions (see above) as they've been made to comply with specific parameters.
So the number from a report won't mean all for your situation. But the number for one stove is at least somewhat apples to apples compared to another stove ..
I agree thus that testing is not giving numbers that are what you would get if you measured heat flows at home.
They are meant for govt imposed standards (epa, hence independent testing!), and many mfgs do pick the best numbers to advertise. (As in all ads...)
The point is that you can compare stoves based on these test results as the only difference is the stove, not all the other conditions (see above) as they've been made to comply with specific parameters.
So the number from a report won't mean all for your situation. But the number for one stove is at least somewhat apples to apples compared to another stove ..
You're right. I think that it would be nice for custommers to also get the overall efficiency (epa) tests results on the stove advertisements with the combustion efficiency tests already advertised, that way it would gives a good idea in % of the heat that is transfered to the space to be heated. Both tests results could be advertised and at the same time be easier to understand .
Yep effectiveness and affordability are the only thing I care about. With so many other variables not much matters. A guy heating with a 76% efficient stove and loading it with seasoned hardwood will be much happier than a guy with a 82% efficient stove and feeding it cedar. Stack, wood, weather, operator, house and on and on. You couldn't duplicate the factory testing if you tried.
It's surprising how many times the word efficiency and not efficient are used on the forum and in many other places to describe so many different meanings.
Not really different meanings. It's all about getting the most out of what ever you are using
It would be fine if epa ask to manufacturers to indicate on advertisements : the Combustion efficiency with a short description on it and ALSO the overall efficiency with a short description on it. The last one is the percentage of heat that is transfered to the space to be heated when a load (wood., pellets..) is burned. Overall efficiency is a better measure than combustion efficiency of the amount of heat that is delivered to the home.
Yes of course heat transfer efficiency is the more important factor when it comes to heating the home
i have a mixed batch of wood .spruce,ash,maple ,birch,pine maybe some beech'how is a manufacturer going to be able to promise me anything .every fire is different from time burnt to heat output,give general sqft heating capacity and i'm good .
This, way to many variables. Things change depending on wood type, wood moisture content, chimney height, internal/external chimney, insulated/non insulated chimney, outdoor temperature, outdoor wind speed, etc etc etc.
EbS-P
Minister of Fire
Wow lots of talk about a question that in my mind is less relevant than other factors in our lives. More Efficiency saves wood and that saves time and or money.
Air sealing and insulation have a greater effect on this savings than the efficiency differences between modern stoves. How you operate your stove has effect.
No one drives in the exact manner to which epa calculated mileage for vehicles but we use it as a representative guide. We generally don’t compare a sub compact mileage to that of a truck when we are shopping. But it’s there for us to that if we wanted.
Stove top temp is a meaningless number for any efficiency calculation as I could blow lots of cold air across it lowering the temp. This could possibly Increase the efficiency. Instead we should focus on firebox temps. But those high temps are hard to measure.
Air sealing and insulation have a greater effect on this savings than the efficiency differences between modern stoves. How you operate your stove has effect.
No one drives in the exact manner to which epa calculated mileage for vehicles but we use it as a representative guide. We generally don’t compare a sub compact mileage to that of a truck when we are shopping. But it’s there for us to that if we wanted.
Stove top temp is a meaningless number for any efficiency calculation as I could blow lots of cold air across it lowering the temp. This could possibly Increase the efficiency. Instead we should focus on firebox temps. But those high temps are hard to measure.
Similar threads
