Billy123 said:Gary,
Nice work by the way!
Another question:
The screen collector vs. the Flashing type as seen here: (http://www.mobilehomerepair.com/article17solar.htm), both same size, does any type perform better?
Hi,
This is a somewhat unusual design.
As they mention, most collectors of this type would place the absorber panel over the top of the baffles and run the air behind the baffles. There would be no air flow between the glazing the absorber. This is the traditional back pass collector.
They place the absorber behind the baffles and run the airflow between the absorber and the glazing.
This seems questionable to me in that you are scrubbing high speed and hot air over the glazing -- it seems like this would result in increased heat loss out the glazing. This is bad in that the heat loss out the glazing is nearly all of the collector heat loss -- its basically the reason that typical air heating collectors run at 40 or so percent efficient instead of 90% efficient. So, generally you want to do things avoid heat loss out the glazing.
This is a long way of saying that I think the screen collector is probably more efficient. But, I've never tested the two side by side, so I could certainly be wrong.
Another factor to think about is that the back pass collector (a collector with baffles to force the air to pass over the full absorber surface) had a lot more pressure drop than the screen collector. This means a bigger fan and nosier fan that uses more power if you want to achieve the same flow rate.
Gary