I really see it a shame what has happened to the pellet situation. Now, I am purely looking at it from a "global warming" and ecological perspective. We all hear and read about diff areas around country who have pellet shortages or astronomical prices (saw recently 7.98/bag). A good many people bought the stoves in hopes of saving $$$$, some bought to be ecologically sensitive. Many for other reasons. Just seems as if there is such a huge fluctuation in prices/supply around the country. I believe that pellet stoves can have there place in an urban environment. IN fact, they would do good in an urban environment. But some where along the line, economics come into play. We all to a certain degree want to be ecologically sensitive, up to a certain price point. From all evidence and studies published, biomass is one way to negating "global warming emissions" Let us not get into that discussion. But biomass can play a large role. Now not everyone is going to rush out and buy a pellet stove, but a certain portion will, based on current popularity. There will come a certain point one could not and will justify running the stove. But even more importantly, I foresee that with all the negative press about pellet prices and supply; people will give up on their current stove (making it a nice planter or place to put nic naks) and others will not even consider one, continuing 100% fossil fuel based. There was recently a large study published on why CFLs haven't caught on, and it was largely that people have had negative experiences with fluoroescents in past (ugly lighting, price, availability, etc.) Just wish someone/group could work out all the kinks with the industry, b/c it is an ecologically viable option.