Ashful
Minister of Fire
First, good job at getting the concepts down pretty quick. Most folks need to buy a stove, and spend some time with it, to get where you already are.That's a ton of really good info! It seems like at this point its a matter of usage preference. In essence, do I want to keep a fire going consistently with low output and get a BK, or pump and glide with a smaller stove to use as mainly supplemental heat, for fun, and emergencies. The latter option definitely fits more to my style. A "nice fire view and a chill chaser" is exactly what I'm after.
The small stoves you guys mentioned would certainly fit the bill, but this thing is going to be the centerpiece of my house. It really has to be pretty, especially since at least 60% of the year it'll be sitting idle.
My father in law really likes the VC line of stoves and suggested I take a look, and as much as I hate to say it the Intrepid II would be a good compromise, at least on paper. Cat stove, longer burn times, low turn down ratio, relatively low clearances, and its gorgeous. Someone please talk me out of this.
Second, as your father-in-law has noted, VC was once a great company with excellent product. Unfortunately, that time may have been three decades and four owners ago. Do a little reading on VC on this forum and elsewhere, and it will almost certainly be enough to sway your opinion against VC. Very pretty stoves, but a horrendous reliability record, backed up by an even worse customer service record.
If you like the VC look, but want a better quality product in a small package, there's always the Pacific Energy Alderlea T4, Jotul F100 (or F3 CB), or several other "pretty" stoves from which you can choose.