And if I do flop a big enough round on it vertical, and it's not hitched to my SXS, that front end sure does get light.
The tongue weight on the Huskee 22-ton is substantial, as the balance point of the beam & cylinder assembly is well forward of the axle. I regularly put 80 lb. rounds up on the horizontal beam without tippage.That's funny. All the weight is behind the wheels. Not on the tongue.
Vertical? Non issue. It's planted, when vertical.And if I do flop a big enough round on it vertical, and it's not hitched to my SXS, that front end sure does get light.
As I've stated numerous times: I loathe splitting vertical. Preference is self fulfilling.The tongue weight on the Huskee 22-ton is substantial, as the balance point of the beam & cylinder assembly is well forward of the axle. I regularly put 80 lb. rounds up on the horizontal beam without tippage.
Vertical? Non issue. It's planted, when vertical.
Where in Illinois? Can I come get it?!As I've stated numerous times: I loathe splitting vertical. Preference is self fulfilling.
I'm not going to get into semantics with you, or anyone else that loves to play semantics on here. My Huskee 35T is a real pile. For $2000 it's not a good buy. I'll take my $1100 22T Ariens any day over my Huskee. In fact, just to spite you, I'm going to leave my Huskee on the curb for someone to come get. That's how highly I think of it. It's unbalanced. The size of a small car. Weighs a TON. PIA to move by hand. Practically impossible to move by hand in the bush.
He's threatening to give away a piece of equipment he could easily sell on C'list for $800, just to "spite" someone on the internet whom he has never met, following some fairly innocuous replies to his posts. Do you really think this guy has his head screwed on straight enough to care?If you're going to give it away, give it to a hearth member already!
PS. I loved your recent post of your third Jotul. Beautiful. My wife loved it and was disappointed it was no longer in production. Gorgeous stove and home!He's threatening to give away a piece of equipment he could easily sell on C'list for $800, just to "spite" someone on the internet whom he has never met, following some fairly innocuous replies to his posts. Do you really think this guy has his head screwed on straight enough to care?
I'm not sure how one should feel spite, but I can say I do hope he gives it away, and posts back here when the deed is done. I need a good laugh.
Can I have the beam? I've got a ditch out back that I want to build a bridge over.As I've stated numerous times: I loathe splitting vertical. Preference is self fulfilling.
I'm not going to get into semantics with you, or anyone else that loves to play semantics on here. My Huskee 35T is a real pile. For $2000 it's not a good buy. I'll take my $1100 22T Ariens any day over my Huskee. In fact, just to spite you, I'm going to leave my Huskee on the curb for someone to come get. That's how highly I think of it. It's unbalanced. The size of a small car. Weighs a TON. PIA to move by hand. Practically impossible to move by hand in the bush.
Did one even better. I blew it sky high with tannerite.He's threatening to give away a piece of equipment he could easily sell on C'list for $800, just to "spite" someone on the internet whom he has never met, following some fairly innocuous replies to his posts. Do you really think this guy has his head screwed on straight enough to care?
I'm not sure how one should feel spite, but I can say I do hope he gives it away, and posts back here when the deed is done. I need a good laugh.
What a shame... didn't your mother tell you there are poor starving children in Africa, who have no log splitter at all?Did one even better. I blew it sky high with tannerite.
Fabricated beams prove effective as well, vs. extruded.I beams aren't the most efficient use of steel for wood splitters.... The OP does have a point. In order to resist the twisting forces heavier h-beams are needed then using rectangle tube.
Cost vs. "good enough." Definitely not ideal, but the sole advantage of switching from an I-beam to a square tube is weight. You can always buy a heavier I-beam, and they're cheap.I beams aren't the most efficient use of steel for wood splitters.... The OP does have a point. In order to resist the twisting forces heavier h-beams are needed then using rectangle tube.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.