Firstly, thanks for all of the info in these forums.
I did a quick search and couldn't find anything on my particular topic so here goes.
I have a PE Pacific wood insert. The stove works great and I feel that is pretty much perfectly sized for my home. However, I would like to be able to limit the air intake more than is currently available. With the damper fully closed I feel that there is a little too much air entering the box. This is causing shorter than possible burn times and also a lack of full control of a full load of wood.
Now, I understand that the stove must be fed sufficient air to allow secondary burning for emissions (as well as optimum heat output) reasons. The reason that I feel that a little more restriction would be beneficial is that shortly after the fire is first started (or a new load of fuel is added) I close that damper fully and have a nice, rolling secondary burn visible above the fuel and no smoke from the chimney. This is how I have always maintained the burn in other stoves with excellent results regarding both heat output and low smoke/creosote. As that new fire reaches temperature in my Pacific, the secondary burn becomes almost "hurried" looking and seems to flare quite a bit when compared with that nice rolling flame that I am used to.
1. Is the situation that I am describing what is actually desired by EPA standards and the stove manufacturers?
2. Are there more BTU's/longer burn times to be obtained from a reduction in air the the box is allowed without the fire becoming smokey/producing excess creosote?
3. Any suggestions on how this could be done on my particular insert?
All suggestions and advice are appreciated.
Thanks.
I did a quick search and couldn't find anything on my particular topic so here goes.
I have a PE Pacific wood insert. The stove works great and I feel that is pretty much perfectly sized for my home. However, I would like to be able to limit the air intake more than is currently available. With the damper fully closed I feel that there is a little too much air entering the box. This is causing shorter than possible burn times and also a lack of full control of a full load of wood.
Now, I understand that the stove must be fed sufficient air to allow secondary burning for emissions (as well as optimum heat output) reasons. The reason that I feel that a little more restriction would be beneficial is that shortly after the fire is first started (or a new load of fuel is added) I close that damper fully and have a nice, rolling secondary burn visible above the fuel and no smoke from the chimney. This is how I have always maintained the burn in other stoves with excellent results regarding both heat output and low smoke/creosote. As that new fire reaches temperature in my Pacific, the secondary burn becomes almost "hurried" looking and seems to flare quite a bit when compared with that nice rolling flame that I am used to.
1. Is the situation that I am describing what is actually desired by EPA standards and the stove manufacturers?
2. Are there more BTU's/longer burn times to be obtained from a reduction in air the the box is allowed without the fire becoming smokey/producing excess creosote?
3. Any suggestions on how this could be done on my particular insert?
All suggestions and advice are appreciated.
Thanks.