I'm not sure the 68 has a hopper extension on it now. Maybe the seller has one that I'm missing. The stock P68 has a 76 lb. hopper as OEM equipment. If my hopper is totally empty I can and have gotten two bags into it or 80 lbs of pellets. I dump them in as much as it will take and then massage them around a bit and this frees up a little room to work the remaining pellets left in the second bag. The hopper is stuffed to the gills but it can be done.
The factory hopper sticks up past the top of the stove a couple of inches from the flat part of the top steel. I just went and looked at my PC45 and they look about the same as to how the hopper sticks up.
I looked at the seller's listing again and the pics. The 68 doesn't look like it has heat shields or a hopper extension on it. I think the seller copied a spec and option sheet after re-reading the ad to stick into the sale ad. The seller does have a bunch of money in options though from what I see as is. The more the merrier and adds to the deal. If this stove would have been around when I was shopping for my P68 I would have likely jumped on this because of the accessories and being able to save a couple of grand. Then that extra cash would have paid for the used PC45 with the leftover cash paying for venting on both.
Hopefully the OP assesses everything and figures out a good deal. Either stove will heat him up. I think we can all agree if he was pulling a new one off of the showroom floor a 61 would be the stove. But beggars looking for deals in the used dept. have to roll with the options they have. I see both of his options as winners it is just how the OP wants to win the race.
As suggested by many around here it may be a good idea to google the manuals for both to see if anything factors in but I think Bogie covered that because the only difference would be clearances between the two.
The factory hopper sticks up past the top of the stove a couple of inches from the flat part of the top steel. I just went and looked at my PC45 and they look about the same as to how the hopper sticks up.
I looked at the seller's listing again and the pics. The 68 doesn't look like it has heat shields or a hopper extension on it. I think the seller copied a spec and option sheet after re-reading the ad to stick into the sale ad. The seller does have a bunch of money in options though from what I see as is. The more the merrier and adds to the deal. If this stove would have been around when I was shopping for my P68 I would have likely jumped on this because of the accessories and being able to save a couple of grand. Then that extra cash would have paid for the used PC45 with the leftover cash paying for venting on both.
Hopefully the OP assesses everything and figures out a good deal. Either stove will heat him up. I think we can all agree if he was pulling a new one off of the showroom floor a 61 would be the stove. But beggars looking for deals in the used dept. have to roll with the options they have. I see both of his options as winners it is just how the OP wants to win the race.
As suggested by many around here it may be a good idea to google the manuals for both to see if anything factors in but I think Bogie covered that because the only difference would be clearances between the two.