I've had an accentra insert for 6 years. Ran it two years before installing an OAK. Decided on an OAK in 2016 and it seemed better, but not quantifiable. This season, after cleaning, I noticed it wasn't burning right. After pulling it out again, I discovered I pinched off my homemade OAK on reinstall. Decided to just run without it. Major difference in draft and temperature in the house. It used to heat up 3 rooms, now it only kept one warm. Decided this morning to reinstall my OAK. World of difference.
But the plural of anecdote is not data, so as a professional mechanical engineer who has worked in HVAC and industrial district heating plants, I started to play with some numbers to see if I could get to the bottom of it.
Using assumption of 0 degree OAK intake air vs. 70 degree room air and assuming the combustion fan pulls about 75 CFM, I figure the stove needs to produce an additional 5,670 BTU per hour to heat the outside air coming in the home (or reduces stove heating capacity.) That being said, the stove with an OAK would need to burn a few more pellets to pre-heat the 0 degree outside air to be an equivalency. But, with all puts and takes at an assumed 80% efficiency, I still figure the OAK saves about 1,200 BTU per hour or 28,000 BTU for a full day run, so that would be about 3 pounds per full day run savings.
I don't care much about the miniscule savings, but I absolutely am convinced an OAK kit is the way to go based on drafts and family comfort. The fact that I've got some numbers to back me up makes me feel better.
Trent
- "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
- -Albert Einstein