churchillrow said:
pybyr said:
churchillrow said:
We're looking at roughly 300000 btu which seems to be the upper end of the residential boilers.
If I recall correctly, Econoburn will build 500,000 and 1 million BTU/hr units for burning firewood. They're available with ASME rating, too, which is often required by certain codes.
in my situation I don't think firing 5 times a day as heaterman suggested Would be necessary for the garn would work as it would be paid staff stoking the fire and that is getting to be a full time job. If they can afford it we'll try to size the boiler so that their firing max 2x per day at peak load. Is it just my perception or are the garns more "plug and play" than the other boilers. Obviously you don't need to hook up storage and I've yet to see a "tuning your garn" thread.
By the way, where are all the self feeding cord wood boilers
IMHO, the issue is basically that cordwood doesn't scale UP well - as the demand goes up, the time and effort to process and handle the wood gets excessive, plus stuffing it all into the boiler... Even sizing for only a couple burns a day doesn't help that much, as it is going to take longer to fill a bigger firebox, just because you need more wood...
OTOH, as I mentioned earlier, chips don't scale DOWN well - there is a certain level of expensive infrastructure that you need to support chips, and it doesn't make a good fit with a small boiler...
Automating cordwood doesn't work because cordwood is to irregular to work well with automation.... To automate cordwood you'd need a very sophisticated robotic hand and arm to deal with the different sizes and shapes in the pile, and very sophisticated multi angle machine vision with a lot of complex algorithms and fuzzy logic to figure out how best to fit each split into the firebox. Unless you are really fussy about what you take for splits, (which makes your acquisition costs higher) they will come in different shapes and lengths - round, pie wedged, trapezoidal, rectangular, and so on, not to mention changing from one end to the other, and crooked - when a human loads a firebox, he plays a sort of subconscious "Tetris" game of how best to place each split so that it will give a properly packed firebox. However unlike Tetris, the blocks aren't uniform, so there is a lot of "best fit" estimating involved - from a computer science standpoint this is a VERY tough problem... It MIGHT be possible to solve it today, but it would take some really serious money and effort, and I wouldn't put bets on it being successful any time soon...
Unfortunately Como and some of the other folks with large scale projects that have posted here, are at that middle size "dead zone" where they are at the upper end of practical for cordwood, but not big enough to be cost effective for chips...
Gooserider