I have had a Taylor outdoor stove helping a propane boiler for the house and also heating a 1280 sq ft shop/studio for the past 25 years, and I am suspicious that it's on it's last legs. I want a good wood stove for heating the shop/studio that is well insulated with straw bale construction, but has 12 to 20 ft ceiling.
We would like a soapstone stove to retain the heat, but I'm not certain that is the best move. South central west Wisconsin has cold months, and sooner or later the Taylor outdoor stove will be toast. Right now the Taylor outdoor stove keeps the shop at 42 f. And we have a small inadequate quadra fire wood stove that barely raises the temperature.
We have a couple hundred acres in extremely hilly country, some forested, but can't always get to the deadfall we like to use. Last year I used almost all my wood up. I am 70 years old and slowing down considerably in the wood gathering department, so I want something efficient.
I got a lot out of the professor's post and all of your fine responses, which is quite similar to my situation in sq ft heated, and gathering dry wood appropriate for burning in an efficient stove.
I am capable of making a stove and probably have enough flat stock and angle, would need a good door and hinges, but don't feel that ambitious. I don't know if mine would be as efficient and wouldn't mind spending necessary funds for a good stove. We live here all the time, but we aren't always in the shop.
Would a soapstone stove be a good idea? I understand there is some maintenance of the catalytic converter, even replacing which i don't like that idea.
Is avoiding a catalytic converter prudent? I would like a stove that could burn wood with a little more moisture, although we could possibly buy a load, which I don't like the idea.
Thank you for your expert opinions, and any offerings in prudent advice would be well considered.
I'm originally from the country in Northeastern Minnesota that grew up hauling in wood.
We would like a soapstone stove to retain the heat, but I'm not certain that is the best move. South central west Wisconsin has cold months, and sooner or later the Taylor outdoor stove will be toast. Right now the Taylor outdoor stove keeps the shop at 42 f. And we have a small inadequate quadra fire wood stove that barely raises the temperature.
We have a couple hundred acres in extremely hilly country, some forested, but can't always get to the deadfall we like to use. Last year I used almost all my wood up. I am 70 years old and slowing down considerably in the wood gathering department, so I want something efficient.
I got a lot out of the professor's post and all of your fine responses, which is quite similar to my situation in sq ft heated, and gathering dry wood appropriate for burning in an efficient stove.
I am capable of making a stove and probably have enough flat stock and angle, would need a good door and hinges, but don't feel that ambitious. I don't know if mine would be as efficient and wouldn't mind spending necessary funds for a good stove. We live here all the time, but we aren't always in the shop.
Would a soapstone stove be a good idea? I understand there is some maintenance of the catalytic converter, even replacing which i don't like that idea.
Is avoiding a catalytic converter prudent? I would like a stove that could burn wood with a little more moisture, although we could possibly buy a load, which I don't like the idea.
Thank you for your expert opinions, and any offerings in prudent advice would be well considered.
I'm originally from the country in Northeastern Minnesota that grew up hauling in wood.