Hello to all the fine knowledgeable people on this forum.
Here is another newbie for you who is very interested in the wood boiler gasification concept. I have 2150 sq ft. that I am interested in heating between two buildings - the primary house (old renovated farm house 1500 sq. ft) and a soon to be newly constructed outbuilding (well insulated 650 sq. ft.). I have been studying this forum for the last several days and have talked to and looked at most of the frequently discussed units from Tarm, Eko and Alternative. I have also found another one that seems to be interesting ...the Seqoyah 3300. It can be looked at at http://www.wdheat.com/Gasification E3300.htm.
I am located in Tennessee.
I am interested in putting in radiant heat in the slab of the new outbuilding and at the very least a water to heat exchanger in the current conventional system in the main house. I may also put in some under floor radiant heat in the main house to take care of about 500 sq ft. of it. I can get to the crawl space for this, but then the rest of the first floor is not accessible for a radiant floor heat install without major tearout and the upstairs would require major modifications to install radiant in floor in it as well. My thinking is to relocate the thermostat for the forced air system upstairs and if the heat rising from the downstairs does not take care of its heating needs then the forced air would kick in and take care of that.
After looking at all the commentary on this forum ....I am starting to shy away from the wood boiler idea totally. This is primarily because I get the impression that these systems are finicky and maintenance intensive. I want to state that I have no problem with doing the work of aquiring and drying firewood. My plan was to cut and stack it in the spring and early summer.
My concern is:
1. Judging by the various discussions of managing a fire in these things, they are finicky and require a decent amount of attention.
2. It seems that these systems require fairly consistent/cumbersome cleanout.
3. That because my demands on the system are nowhere near what they would be for a large structure located in a colder climate, I should be putting in a storage tank with it. This of course increases cost and is more to deal with etc.
4. During the cold months a user is tied to a boiler and cannot leave for a couple of days without either draining the system, putting anitfreeze in or having someone else tend to keeping a fire in the boiler.
I am very interested in the idea of a wood gasification unit but not if it increases my "headaches" in life. A headache to me is not necessarily getting the fuel for it but all the other maintenance issues that seem to be prevelant with this technology. While I do not like buying propane and supporting this type of energy fuel, I also am hesitant in increasing my maintenance responsibilities.
This all brings me to the Sequoyah gasification unit I highlighted above. This unit has a much bigger firebox and more firebrick in it. As a result the manufacturer claims a storage tank is not needed and it needs to be tended to less than others. Additionally the maintenance of it seems to be less as a result.
So as happens a lot on this forum, I ask that all of the knowledgeable minds here examine my concerns and advise as best you can.
I really appreciate any input and thank everyone who contributes here.
RH
Here is another newbie for you who is very interested in the wood boiler gasification concept. I have 2150 sq ft. that I am interested in heating between two buildings - the primary house (old renovated farm house 1500 sq. ft) and a soon to be newly constructed outbuilding (well insulated 650 sq. ft.). I have been studying this forum for the last several days and have talked to and looked at most of the frequently discussed units from Tarm, Eko and Alternative. I have also found another one that seems to be interesting ...the Seqoyah 3300. It can be looked at at http://www.wdheat.com/Gasification E3300.htm.
I am located in Tennessee.
I am interested in putting in radiant heat in the slab of the new outbuilding and at the very least a water to heat exchanger in the current conventional system in the main house. I may also put in some under floor radiant heat in the main house to take care of about 500 sq ft. of it. I can get to the crawl space for this, but then the rest of the first floor is not accessible for a radiant floor heat install without major tearout and the upstairs would require major modifications to install radiant in floor in it as well. My thinking is to relocate the thermostat for the forced air system upstairs and if the heat rising from the downstairs does not take care of its heating needs then the forced air would kick in and take care of that.
After looking at all the commentary on this forum ....I am starting to shy away from the wood boiler idea totally. This is primarily because I get the impression that these systems are finicky and maintenance intensive. I want to state that I have no problem with doing the work of aquiring and drying firewood. My plan was to cut and stack it in the spring and early summer.
My concern is:
1. Judging by the various discussions of managing a fire in these things, they are finicky and require a decent amount of attention.
2. It seems that these systems require fairly consistent/cumbersome cleanout.
3. That because my demands on the system are nowhere near what they would be for a large structure located in a colder climate, I should be putting in a storage tank with it. This of course increases cost and is more to deal with etc.
4. During the cold months a user is tied to a boiler and cannot leave for a couple of days without either draining the system, putting anitfreeze in or having someone else tend to keeping a fire in the boiler.
I am very interested in the idea of a wood gasification unit but not if it increases my "headaches" in life. A headache to me is not necessarily getting the fuel for it but all the other maintenance issues that seem to be prevelant with this technology. While I do not like buying propane and supporting this type of energy fuel, I also am hesitant in increasing my maintenance responsibilities.
This all brings me to the Sequoyah gasification unit I highlighted above. This unit has a much bigger firebox and more firebrick in it. As a result the manufacturer claims a storage tank is not needed and it needs to be tended to less than others. Additionally the maintenance of it seems to be less as a result.
So as happens a lot on this forum, I ask that all of the knowledgeable minds here examine my concerns and advise as best you can.
I really appreciate any input and thank everyone who contributes here.
RH