New topics Vs. Heated debates

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.

adrpga498

Minister of Fire
Hearth Supporter
Nov 18, 2005
942
New Jersey
Nice to read new topics about wood burning again. I read enough heated debates about .....well I'd rather just move on and enjoy the very useful forum.
 
yes, its ironic. When i first started hanging out here i was in a very closed industry inviroment. I have been in the same hearth shop for a long time, with no real outside influeneces. You get kind of in a educational rut that way. I was sure i was right on some things, and thought that our way was the only way. What this forum has taught me that there are many ways to skin a <insert most hated animal here>. Some of the issues like draft, outside air, wood type, etc, have no wrong or right answer. Every situation is unique and very rarley is there a blanket answer to any given problem. This forum has helped me in my profession immensly.
 
MountainStoveGuy said:
yes, its ironic. When i first started hanging out here i was in a very closed industry inviroment. I have been in the same hearth shop for a long time, with no real outside influeneces. You get kind of in a educational rut that way. I was sure i was right on some things, and thought that our way was the only way. What this forum has taught me that there are many ways to skin a <insert most hated animal here>. Some of the issues like draft, outside air, wood type, etc, have no wrong or right answer. Every situation is unique and very rarley is there a blanket answer to any given problem. This forum has helped me in my profession immensly.

I teach golf with a very open mind. If i didn't I would go broke in a hurry. I have learned that I must learn something new every day to be an effective intructor.
 
adrpga498 said:
MountainStoveGuy said:
yes, its ironic. When i first started hanging out here i was in a very closed industry inviroment. I have been in the same hearth shop for a long time, with no real outside influeneces. You get kind of in a educational rut that way. I was sure i was right on some things, and thought that our way was the only way. What this forum has taught me that there are many ways to skin a <insert most hated animal here>. Some of the issues like draft, outside air, wood type, etc, have no wrong or right answer. Every situation is unique and very rarley is there a blanket answer to any given problem. This forum has helped me in my profession immensly.

I teach golf with a very open mind. If i didn't I would go broke in a hurry. I have learned that I must learn something new every day to be an effective intructor.

I would do better if I used spell check more often.

instructor. bogey
 
There are some people that will not post or post as often because they are afraid for the spelling cops.
 
No one should be afraid to post. Other than poking a bit of fun or asking what a person meant, I think this is a pretty laid-back board for spelling. That said, it really does help to put the extra effort into getting the thread title spelling correct. It really helps facilitate future searches.

I've learned a whole lot from posts on this board, bad spelling and all. Anyone who has pounded nails all day and then has tried to type (with maybe a brew or two) knows that one's hands become hamhocks and typos are going to happen. The fact that Elk provides some long posts after a hard day's work is pretty impressive. I'd probably just give up.
 
hearthtools said:
There are some people that will not post or post as often because they are afraid for the spelling cops.

I guess we can assume Elk has never feared any spelling cops :) I guess I missed a lot this weekend, seems like something big went down. I'm sure it was not easy.
 
I have learned a lot here and am greatful to everyone for the information they share, regardless of how well it's written or spelled.

In life it's the journey that's important, not the destination; on Hearth.com it's the content that counts, not the delivery.
 
I guess I missed a lot this weekend, seems like something big went down. I’m sure it was not easy.

Your are right, the San Diego Chargers went down
 
elkimmeg said:
I guess I missed a lot this weekend, seems like something big went down. I’m sure it was not easy.

Your are right, the San Diego Chargers went down
I've been waiting for that for 23 hours.
schheeew... I thought the world had come to a grinding halt.
 
MountainStoveGuy said:
yes, its ironic. When i first started hanging out here i was in a very closed industry inviroment. I have been in the same hearth shop for a long time, with no real outside influeneces. You get kind of in a educational rut that way. I was sure i was right on some things, and thought that our way was the only way. What this forum has taught me that there are many ways to skin a <insert most hated animal here>. Some of the issues like draft, outside air, wood type, etc, have no wrong or right answer. Every situation is unique and very rarley is there a blanket answer to any given problem. This forum has helped me in my profession immensly.

MSG, you are so right. That's been my position all along as a local stove dealer. But, ya know, it seems there are more and more folks who insist that I give them the answer. I am getting better at "suggesting" the solution is "this". Too many people cannot make up their own mind and want help with the decision making. Not here, of course. But in my BAM job.
 
elkimmeg said:
I guess I missed a lot this weekend, seems like something big went down. I’m sure it was not easy.

Your are right, the San Diego Chargers went down

SeaHawks too.
 
Spelling is not as important as content, period. One of my closest friends is a medical doctor. A very, very smart man, but can't spell to save his life. I'm constantly teasing him about his spelling, but more poking fun than trying to get on his nerves. I think the same thing goes on here, no harm in poking a little fun... no one is being graded on what they write.

-Kevin
 
Some of my post in the past have had comments made about my spelling and grammer.
so I just dont post as much any more.
 
Rod, i dont know about you, but i squeeze hearth.com in my schedule this time of year. I rarley make posts that are more then a paragraph, and i also dont wast time proofing for spelling. I glance at my statement and if it seems ok then i hit the send button. I figure, if someone wants to correct my spelling, then they cant correct my answer. I think the answer trumps the speller.
 
Typo away to your heart's content!

"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are... the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
 
Man you guys have horrible spelling. :)
 
Hasn't anyone noticed the little "Check Spelling" link when you click Post Reply? I use it occasionally, but only when I'm really not sure how to spell something.

It doesn't work for Fast Replies, but does for Post Replie :coolsmile:
 

Attachments

  • [Hearth.com] New topics Vs. Heated debates
    spell.webp
    3.8 KB · Views: 315
If the spelling cops cometh, than I out of here, I know ,I'm the worst offender

Can anyone fill me in What recently happened I was painting rooms watching football this weekend and all of a sudden
I feel I missed something. I do not read all threads only the ones that interest me.

Did some spelling cops drum someone out of here? If you don't feel it is worthy to post, PM me what going on or went on.

As much time as I spend here I can't imagine I missed something Was it in the ash can which I rarily visit?
 
PacificGuyInCNY said:
Typo away to your heart's content!

"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are... the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."

WOW that was amazing! I actually read all that 'crap' as easily and more importantly as fast as if it was written correctly! I think that proves the point 110%! I still find this amazing! Talk about learning something new every day!

As long as this is being discussed, and I am just saying this in general NOT to any one person or persons here, I never have nor will I criticize your spelling. That said, you're driving me crazy with the incorrect usage of your/you're. Same applies to their/there/they're. Perhaps this will help those that care -

"your" is possessive as in your soapstone wood stove is beautiful.
"you're" is a contraction for "you are" as in you are correct, the soapstone wood stove is beautiful.

"their" is possessive as in their wood pile is stacked perfectly.
"there" denotes location or position as in the wood pile is over there by the wood shed.
"they're" is a contraction as in they are going to use the wood stove tonight.

I think a lot of people just don't know the difference, I see this a lot on the internet but also in work. I wish I knew when and why to use whom vs who, somewhere along the line I missed that in school! I have looked it up but it's more complicated than the contraction vs possession concept.

The easiest way to know which word to use is to determine if you are referring to possession then the word would be your or their. Hey, I don't see anyone talking about their would pile!


Tom ducking the splits being tossed his way :)
 
I know that was discussed in English class, But like many guys , We were checking out the Mini skirts instead of paying attention.

I did not have the best English teachers. I used that Class to do my Math homework. Never paid too much attention, now I wish I had.

Youre right should have paid attention, To busy working out Friday's night date
 
tjg911 said:
PacificGuyInCNY said:
Typo away to your heart's content!

"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are... the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."

WOW that was amazing! I actually read all that 'crap' as easily and more importantly as fast as if it was written correctly! I think that proves the point 110%! I still find this amazing! Talk about learning something new every day!

As long as this is being discussed, and I am just saying this in general NOT to any one person or persons here, I never have nor will I criticize your spelling. That said, you're driving me crazy with the incorrect usage of your/you're. Same applies to their/there/they're. Perhaps this will help those that care -

"your" is possessive as in your soapstone wood stove is beautiful.
"you're" is a contraction for "you are" as in you are correct, the soapstone wood stove is beautiful.

"their" is possessive as in their wood pile is stacked perfectly.
"there" denotes location or position as in the wood pile is over there by the wood shed.
"they're" is a contraction as in they are going to use the wood stove tonight.

I think a lot of people just don't know the difference, I see this a lot on the internet but also in work. I wish I knew when and why to use whom vs who, somewhere along the line I missed that in school! I have looked it up but it's more complicated than the contraction vs possession concept.

The easiest way to know which word to use is to determine if you are referring to possession then the word would be your or their. Hey, I don't see anyone talking about their would pile!


Tom ducking the splits being tossed his way :)

Mabey there is a grammer forum for you to hang out at ;)

There should be bigger things to worry about then you getting irriated when other people dont use the proper english. No offense, but it seems trivial, expecialy in a forum dedicated to hearth products.
 
MountainStoveGuy said:
tjg911 said:
PacificGuyInCNY said:
Typo away to your heart's content!

"
Mabey there is a grammer forum for you to hang out at ;)

There should be bigger things to worry about then you getting irriated when other people dont use the proper english. No offense, but it seems trivial, expecialy in a forum dedicated to hearth products.

yeah it is trival, i said what i wanted and pointed stated i was directing the comments at no person. i even added a :) so as to add a light nature to it all.

it ain't know bigg deal sew eye amn't sweetin it. knot sitin up at knight worryin.

tmo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.