exactLEE said:
YES, they do kill just to kill but 95 % of the time it is out of necessity. I've seen it and studied it. For the most part they are scavengers but when predator populations explode and prey populations dwindle they resort to the easiest thing they can find weather it be a cat, small dog or unattended child
Considering that the coyote is one of the most adaptable animals, and are frequently seen even in urban areas displaying little fear of living in close proximity to humans where there often isn't a very large prey population, the incidence of coyotes attacking unattended children should by your reasoning be considerably higher than it is. How many children were attacked by coyotes this past year compared to how many were abducted by humans or attacked by domesticated dogs?
The California Dept. of Fish and Game reports that one person is bitten by a coyote each year (bitten, not killed.) California is considered to be prime habitat for coyotes. They report that they have one documented death resulting from a coyote attack.
3 million children are bitten by domestic dogs (pets) each year
300 people had been killed by domestic dogs between 1979 and the late 90's
If you're likening coyotes to murderers, rapists, and molesters, how would you characterize domestic dogs?
Coyotes are not Disney characters but opportunistic wild animals that anybody should have a healthy respect for. California and Texas share similar statistics on pet losses yet while California reports occasional attacks on humans, in Texas there have been few, if any. Some scientists speculate this may be due to differing attitudes towards coyotes: Texas has more ranching and the protective attitudes that follow, while some Southern Californians are being accused of intentionally feeding coyotes and thus encouraging their associating easy picking with gentle humans.
I think that there is a middle ground of reason to consider here. While coyotes are far from being the nightmarish killers some make them out to be, they are never the less wild animals that can easily become adapted to living very close to humans. In suburban and urban areas, where they lose their fear of us and where much of the conflict occurs, it's difficult to instill a healthy fear of humans in them - we can't hunt in these areas. I don't know how they can be addressed in these areas aside from stiff penalties for the ignorant individuals that are feeding them. The hunting season for them here in New york runs for 6 months and there is no bag limit, so in areas where you can hunt that is a real liberal season.
As for myself, I've lived in the Adirondacks all my life and we have many coyotes here. I live right in the woods and miles from the nearest village and I spend a lot of time hunting and fishing. The only times I see coyotes is when I'm driving in my car. I can't speak for others, but coyotes have never approached my two children (7+5) who play out doors most days, I've never lost a hog or a chicken to coyotes, and if they'll take dogs they've yet to attack mine. Am I ignorant to their threat? No, the kids have to play near the house where I can easily see them, and when they go to collect eggs the dog goes with them and they go together. But I also don't let them out during electrical storms, I don't let them play in the woods during real windy days, they can't ever go to the pond without me or their mother, and when we go to the city I have what most would consider a real unreasonable fear of the "coyotes" there. There are threats other than coyotes that are millions of times more likely to present themselves. I don't have any interest in hunting them. If the price of their pelt was high enough I don't know that I might want to go after them. I do know hunting for an extra income sounds pretty inviting. In the past when prices were too high and there were bounties on mountain lions and wolves we ended up losing those predators entirely here in NY. I can say I wouldn't want to see that extreme as far as coyotes go. We share the woods and they're a vital part of making what would otherwise be wooded land "wilderness".