It’s not marketing. That super long burn time is the reason I chose a BK. No other stove comes close. It’s all about a wide range of available burn rates and the BK can run clean at very low burn rates.
There are BK 20 box owners on this site that can confirm, more 30 box owners though.
But if you don’t like the look then the keystone is also a great performer with lots of history and happy users getting 12 hour burns.
My princess is not the prettiest stove, I admit, but it burns nice and slow in my 1700 sf home in a moderate climate. When I bought it, the Woodstock fireview was second choice.
Yes, the thermostat! As I'm sure you know, wood burns like a bell curve and the thermostat keeps the burn level so you get a longer drawn out burn instead of peaks and valleys.
And the burn time definitely isn't just marketing, I regularly get 24hrs of ACTIVE cat time on one load of wood when the outside temp is above 15-20*, heating 2000 sq ft With the 3 cubic foot firebox on the princess. I could definitely get 30 hours of heat but by that point the cat is inactive and itd be a "cold reload"
But, if the looks are that much of a deciding factor then get what you'll be happy looking at. Its a big investment but not a permanent one.
So you're saying, running the BK is more similar to the comfort level of a gas stove? If so, why would I buy a Woodstock Keystone over, say the Boxer 24? At least I though that one was alright looking.
Last edited: