Ashful
Minister of Fire
It's hard to see exactly what you're showing in the picture, but I remember the design pretty well from owning a few of these in the past. Those holes behind the cat chamber are the fresh air intake for the catalytic combustor. The basic idea is that wood gas coming out of the firebox mixes with fresh air and burns off in the combustor. The catalyst helps to support this reaction at temperatures down to 500F, which would otherwise require temperatures over 1000F.
However, I believe there is a fatal flaw in this design. I melted several combustors, as I believe they're just a little too small for the size of the firebox. I could control combustor temperature if I only filled the firebox up maybe 60% - 70%, but I would often see unacceptably high combustor temperatures when I would fill the firebox. I had no issues with controlling the fire, it's a good stove in that regard, but running it low would sometimes cause the combustors to peak around 1800 - 2200, which would destroy them.
The typical advice you'll see folks give here is to open up the air a bit, to burn off more of the wood gas in the firebox, and reduce the load on the combustor, but I always found this just got the freight train rolling a lot faster and made it even harder to eventually bring things back down. I sometimes wondered if I would be able to control the combustor temperature better by partially blocking those holes, but never experimented with it. Designers of secondary burn stoves, whether catalytic or non-cat, walk a fine line trying to balance the fuel and air requirements of both the firebox and secondary burn system. I believe these Jotuls were early in the catalytic learning curve, and they got most things right, but not without a few issues.
It's also possible that both of my last two Jotuls had a leak, which caused these combustor over-temp conditions, but I highly doubt it. They'd have to have had the same issue, and both were kept in very good repair.
On the gasket, it was just pinched between the back plate and stove body, or damper frame and back plate or stove body. This is where you need to use bits of masking tape to hold it in place, while reassembling. Some have found it's easier to lay the stove on it's back while doing this part of the reassembly, and I'm sure it would be, but I always managed with the stove installed upright.
However, I believe there is a fatal flaw in this design. I melted several combustors, as I believe they're just a little too small for the size of the firebox. I could control combustor temperature if I only filled the firebox up maybe 60% - 70%, but I would often see unacceptably high combustor temperatures when I would fill the firebox. I had no issues with controlling the fire, it's a good stove in that regard, but running it low would sometimes cause the combustors to peak around 1800 - 2200, which would destroy them.
The typical advice you'll see folks give here is to open up the air a bit, to burn off more of the wood gas in the firebox, and reduce the load on the combustor, but I always found this just got the freight train rolling a lot faster and made it even harder to eventually bring things back down. I sometimes wondered if I would be able to control the combustor temperature better by partially blocking those holes, but never experimented with it. Designers of secondary burn stoves, whether catalytic or non-cat, walk a fine line trying to balance the fuel and air requirements of both the firebox and secondary burn system. I believe these Jotuls were early in the catalytic learning curve, and they got most things right, but not without a few issues.
It's also possible that both of my last two Jotuls had a leak, which caused these combustor over-temp conditions, but I highly doubt it. They'd have to have had the same issue, and both were kept in very good repair.
On the gasket, it was just pinched between the back plate and stove body, or damper frame and back plate or stove body. This is where you need to use bits of masking tape to hold it in place, while reassembling. Some have found it's easier to lay the stove on it's back while doing this part of the reassembly, and I'm sure it would be, but I always managed with the stove installed upright.