Ashful
Minister of Fire
I guess there's no hope of derailment, then. But for the record, I tried. To answer the questions...
I'd consider it. Unfortunately, the thread you created to discuss your recent install got too hot, and I ducked out. It's unfortunate this site has such a strong bias against coal, as I'll have to go elsewhere to really learn the pros and cons of it, without being shaded by the political BS.Coal baby!
No worries. If I eliminate that stove my usage will still be 6+ cords per year, as I'd be keeping the stove that consumes two-thirds of my wood. I'll be able to get by with just four of those sheds, instead of six, and I've only built two so far.He just built a few wood sheds, though.
Them are fighting words... I love my Ashfords! Really, you know I have no hope of heating this joint 100% with wood, unless I make it a full-time job. What's the point of a stove that can consume wood faster than 15 lb./hour, if you can't keep up with feeding it at that rate? I just need a stove that can do perfectly consistent 12-hour cycles, with a very highly-convective factor, and the Ashfords are likely one of the best options at that.How about getting rid of the two low-output stoves and getting one flame-throwing heat monster?
I actually tore one of those out five years ago, to put in a second wood stove! But we don't have NG here, it was propane.Nothing beats a nice efficient NG fireplace.
So is my oil-fired boiler, and it's likely cheaper, more efficient, and more powerful than any direct vent gas fireplace!I do love my direct vent gas fireplace, but I also burn wood/coal because I want to and I really enjoy it. The fireplace is really convenient for quick heat there’s no disputing that.