Also what about splitting ? I found a website that says splitting doesn't really accelerate the seasoning process. Huh ?
The Wood Dog said:wouldnt that restrict airflow and promote humidity ?
mikes67 said:The rubber roofing idea is good, im gonna try that. I bet that gets super hot in the summer and im sure that helps the drying also
mikes67 said:The rubber roofing idea is good, im gonna try that. I bet that gets super hot in the summer and im sure that helps the drying also
The Wood Dog said:Also what about splitting ? I found a website that says splitting doesn't really accelerate the seasoning process. Huh ?
The Wood Dog said:Also what about splitting ? I found a website that says splitting doesn't really accelerate the seasoning process. Huh ?
Backwoods Savage said:Common sense says wood will dry much, much faster after being split because there is more wood exposed to air.
As for tarp covering, tarp is the last resort as there are much better things. However, I have used tarps but don't like them.
When to cover? If you live in a really wet area like Seattle, it is probably best to cover the top as soon as you get the wood stacked. However, for our area we find it best to leave the wood uncovered through the first summer and then cover the top of the stack in late fall or early winter. Then there are others like quads who never covers his wood and he gets along just fine.
Adios Pantalones said:There's all these people saying it dries so much faster through the ends because the water moves along the fibers in channels and blahdy blah blah. If it was true that drying through sides was so much slower, then leaving it in the round would dry about as fast and it doesn't.
The theory was great right up to the point where it didn't predict reality.
firefighterjake said:Adios Pantalones said:There's all these people saying it dries so much faster through the ends because the water moves along the fibers in channels and blahdy blah blah. If it was true that drying through sides was so much slower, then leaving it in the round would dry about as fast and it doesn't.
The theory was great right up to the point where it didn't predict reality.
Ah, but reality is over-rated . . . I prefer to live in my own fantasy dream world with the magical pixies and elves . . .
ISeeDeadBTUs said:using a tarp on the top is better than letting the wood collect rain all summer. But a tarp in probably the next worst thing to nothing.
firefighterjake said:Backwoods Savage said:Common sense says wood will dry much, much faster after being split because there is more wood exposed to air.
As for tarp covering, tarp is the last resort as there are much better things. However, I have used tarps but don't like them.
When to cover? If you live in a really wet area like Seattle, it is probably best to cover the top as soon as you get the wood stacked. However, for our area we find it best to leave the wood uncovered through the first summer and then cover the top of the stack in late fall or early winter. Then there are others like quads who never covers his wood and he gets along just fine.
And once again I find myself agreeing with Dennis . . . in fact it seems we pretty much agree on everything except for his love of vertical splitting and my love of horizontal splitting . . .
Split wood: More surface area exposed = faster seasoning. However, it doesn't take a biologist to tell me the how and why of this . . . all one needs to do is take a round of whatever species they want and leave it for X amount of time and then a) split it and check the moisture with a moisture meter or b) split it down and try to burn it in a woodstove . . . and then compare this same wood's moisture content and burning "ability" against a split from the same tree/species that was split at the same time the other piece was bucked up. If you're comparing apples to apples and oranges to oranges (or in our case apple wood to apple wood or osage orange to osage orange) I think you will find that almost always the split piece will be drier than the wood left in the round.
Tarp: Ah, one of the great debates. Cover vs. no cover. My take on it . . . do what works for you in your area. Me, I don't cover. All my wood for 2010-2011 (or at this point it appears as though it will actually be wood for 2011-2012 based on my consumption this year) is naked . . . in the buff . . . no covers . . . no tarps. Yeah, it may have some snow on it and it may get rained on in the spring and summer . . . but in general this moisture doesn't tend to soak into the wood as if it were a sea sponge. I did cover my wood come Fall (pre-woodshed burning year), but it was more of a convenience thing since I didn't want to knock off snow and ice before burning.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.