Silliest thing I've heard of (so far today). If the bark did fall off, I'd pick it up and throw it in the fire - those are free btu's going to waste. Actually, that is usually my October and most of November wood - pieces of bark, chips from around the splitter and scraggly pieces of wood which can't be stacked. If the bark was wet, I'd just burn some other wood. Bark is like a sponge and will soak up water - but just like a sponge, it dries out pretty quick, too.
Is there a good reason to de-bark wood before burning?
- Thread starter dave11
- Start date
-
Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.
We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.
We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil. -
Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
- Status
If there is bark on the tree when I cut it (many I cut don't have bark on them anyway), and if the bark is still on it after sitting in a stack for five years, and even if the bark falls off in my wood box in the house, it still goes right in the stove with all the rest. Don't know if burning bark is right or wrong, and I've never heard of purposely not burning it, but that's how I do it.
I took the bark off of all pieces I could, even using a small pry bar and brushed off each piece before bringing into the garage to stack (about 4-5 cords), for the last two years.
It takes a lot of time. I did find some little ants under bark. I don't recall much carpenter ant action under the bark, but maybe.
Again, very tedious. Then you have to do something with the bark.
It takes a lot of time. I did find some little ants under bark. I don't recall much carpenter ant action under the bark, but maybe.
Again, very tedious. Then you have to do something with the bark.
velvetfoot said:
It seems a few folks at least here are doing the same. There seem to be a few definite advantages, such as eliminating most insects, faster drying, and easier lighting. Beyond that, it might lead to less creosote in the chimney. Too bad there's not a quick and easy way to debark the stubborn ones.
new to the forum
I cut the logs to length in the spring and split months later (next years + wood)
The bark falls right off (Maple) and the Ash seems to stay put. Years ago I tried burning the dried pile of bark and confirmed the statement of a lot of ash and not much heat.
be warm
tc
I cut the logs to length in the spring and split months later (next years + wood)
The bark falls right off (Maple) and the Ash seems to stay put. Years ago I tried burning the dried pile of bark and confirmed the statement of a lot of ash and not much heat.
be warm
tc
Avitare said:
Welcome to the forum tc.
The bark of ash usually does stay on but once the ash borer gets ahold of it, the bark falls right off. I had a big pile of it last spring after splitting. Seems I'd split a log and the bark just came off without touching it again. Weird, but the insects do lots of damage.
Don't burn bark 
!
It's worse than pine, you will go blind, your hair will fall out, but grow on your palms
and you could have a chimney fire or a chiminea fire if you burn it outside.
Maybe Fiskars will make a wood debarker (with shin guards )soon and save us from the evil bark.
I"m gonna go run and hide now :cheese:
!It's worse than pine, you will go blind, your hair will fall out, but grow on your palms
and you could have a chimney fire or a chiminea fire if you burn it outside.
Maybe Fiskars will make a wood debarker (with shin guards )soon and save us from the evil bark.
I"m gonna go run and hide now :cheese:
You say it in jest but there is some truth to it. It really depends on species and how the wood is stacked/stored. When stacking outdoors I noticed that if it was stacked bark side down that rain often got trapped between the bark and the wood. The wood then can soak up that rain slowing the drying process and creating habitat for insects. Wood stacked bark side up might shield more from the rain if the bark is intact but having no bark is better than loose bark.Birdman1 said:Don't burn bark
It's worse than pine, you will go blind, your hair will fall out, but grow on your palms
and you could have a chimney fire or a chiminea fire if you burn it outside.
Maybe Fiskars will make a wood debarker (with shin guards )soon and save us from the evil bark.
I"m gonna go run and hide now :cheese:
Since I eventually store my wood in a shed the bark is as dry as can be and bark of the Ash tree is not bad. Birch bark, on the other hand, is really bad stuff, particularly the thick stuff on larger rounds. I strip it off since half of it comes off anyway when you split and more of would come away as it dries. Taking it off right away helps the wood dry faster and if Fiskars made a bark peeler I would stand in line to buy one.
Goal:No bark in the Temple = Naked Wood
Rules: Remove as much bark from each piece whenever possible.
PROCESS:
First handling (buck, split, stack) of wet wood will retain most of the bark.
Second and possibly final (final = 1 year minimum) handling of the wood should be a process where you use a tool if necessary to remove as much bark as possible.
BENEFITS:
Burns cleaner: most ash is created from the bark not the wood itself.
Dries quicker: most moisture is contained in the bark, which also acts as a barrier, preventing the rest of the wood from drying.
Less mess: there's no broken-off bark and dirt to clean up!
More storage: without the bark the quantity of wood provided will be 5% to 7% greater per cord.
Better kindling: pieces that may break-off are burnable wood, not just bark.
Rules: Remove as much bark from each piece whenever possible.
PROCESS:
First handling (buck, split, stack) of wet wood will retain most of the bark.
Second and possibly final (final = 1 year minimum) handling of the wood should be a process where you use a tool if necessary to remove as much bark as possible.
BENEFITS:
Burns cleaner: most ash is created from the bark not the wood itself.
Dries quicker: most moisture is contained in the bark, which also acts as a barrier, preventing the rest of the wood from drying.
Less mess: there's no broken-off bark and dirt to clean up!
More storage: without the bark the quantity of wood provided will be 5% to 7% greater per cord.
Better kindling: pieces that may break-off are burnable wood, not just bark.
I scrape off every last bit of bark ...... yea right. Seems like a waste of time for my application with a boiler in a shed outside. When bringing wood into the fireplace I bang the pieces together to knock off the loose stuff and make a little less mess in the house. Some woods like box elder alot falls off at the splitter I save a little for kindling sometimes but throw the majority in the burn pile or the compost pile. I tried burning it a few years ago but it just did not seem to produce a whole lot for the effort.
I don't pay any attention to bark. I let the bark fall where it may. Makes a nice ground cover to keep me out of the dirt in my splitting areas. If a split still has bark clinging to it when it's time to go into the stove, then into the stove goes the split, bark and all. It's all fuel. By the time I burn anything, it's about as seasoned as it's ever gonna get in the dry high desert of central Oregon. Rick
I'll strip bark during splitting if it looks like it wants to come off, or is already wet underneath. I don't have a woodshed so my outdoor stacks can get wet and I've found bark does hold water longer than bare wood. But if it stays on tioght and doesn't look wet, I leave it on.
I use a machette to strip it off. Generally I slide it underneath and pop the bark off rather than whacking at it. Works well for me.
I use a machette to strip it off. Generally I slide it underneath and pop the bark off rather than whacking at it. Works well for me.
A sander is too slow. I take off major protrusions with a hatchet. Back when I was using tarps, it saved them from getting chafed and the wood stacks more stable. Ja, they do pack into the stove better too but the irregular shapes are OK for daytime burning.gzecc said:
![[Hearth.com] Is there a good reason to de-bark wood before burning?](/talk/data/attachments/19/19438-c4f37f2cb3659a88fb3f11c2ce512aab.jpg?hash=6NrWrKUGdV)
![[Hearth.com] Is there a good reason to de-bark wood before burning?](/talk/data/attachments/19/19439-5c0fea52bbed0a02c66936f8f7f1eb93.jpg?hash=aYozu2w2Zw)
Back in my youth, I scrounged a lot of culled Birch from the local plywood mill. Same as your pic except they were more than 4 feet long. IMHO that is how all Birch should be processed.kenny chaos said:
Where I work we have huge dry debarkers for the chains that feed the mill. It does a really good job of taking off the bark which we burn in our biomass boiler but for home use, the wood has too many slivers for bare hands.
I have almost all red oak and the bark can be up to 3/4" thick on some of the bigger rounds. I don't have a woodshed and only top cover, and I'm working on three years ahead so my wood will be exposed to the elements a long time. With red oak bugs seem to like living under the bark so I strip it off with my splitter if it is thick. If it doesn't pop off easily I leave it. The thinner stuff doesn't seem to be a problem.
Now with all that said I've only been burning one year and might change my ways over time. ;-P
Now with all that said I've only been burning one year and might change my ways over time. ;-P
- Status
Similar threads
