Hi folks, I am new to the forum.
I am hoping someone can clarify some stove sizing concerns I have. I am looking for a wood cookstove used mainly to heat and for occasional and back up power outage use. I am currently running a stove in a roughly 2400 sf home and it is running hard around -20. That's the coldest we've seen so far, but -30 to -40 is far from unusual for at least a couple weeks every year.
The house is new and I am running an Archguard Chalet 1800, 35,000 BTU stove that was brought over from the last house to see how well it would work before sizing the stove we want for this house. Firebox is 17” w x 12” h x 20” d. 2.3cf
The stove I originally intended to put in is the Rosa XXL, rated at 30,000 BTU and the firebox is 11.7" W x 12" H x 18.1" D. 1.47cf. I am now thinking this will be too small based on the performance of the above stove. I do not know how thermal mass will play into the equation as the XXL is a lot more stove, but I am searching for something with higher BTU to err on the side of caution.
Enter the Bun Baker, which is rated at 65,000 BTU. The firebox is 19" W x 13" H x 11" D. 1.5cf. There was a detailed review of it, the owner was heating a 2 story 2400 sq ft house. They cut a hole in the floor above the stove to circulate the heat and say it is working amazingly well. They did not, however, share their location. Arizona vs Alberta?
I understand that if the firebox is larger you can fit more fuel and BTU in it. I do not understand how you can get more BTU out of a smaller firebox, so my concern is that the stove I am running now has the largest firebox of them all and is running hard at -20. Could the 65,000 BTU's be accurate or will I find the company has just over rated it and it won't be big enough either? Or, is it possible the stove I really want (number B) which they claim is under rated at heating 1500sf, and can heat larger well insulated spaces (ie- my new house) might actually suffice.
Hoping someone smarter than me can shed some light on things.
Cheers!
I am hoping someone can clarify some stove sizing concerns I have. I am looking for a wood cookstove used mainly to heat and for occasional and back up power outage use. I am currently running a stove in a roughly 2400 sf home and it is running hard around -20. That's the coldest we've seen so far, but -30 to -40 is far from unusual for at least a couple weeks every year.
The house is new and I am running an Archguard Chalet 1800, 35,000 BTU stove that was brought over from the last house to see how well it would work before sizing the stove we want for this house. Firebox is 17” w x 12” h x 20” d. 2.3cf
The stove I originally intended to put in is the Rosa XXL, rated at 30,000 BTU and the firebox is 11.7" W x 12" H x 18.1" D. 1.47cf. I am now thinking this will be too small based on the performance of the above stove. I do not know how thermal mass will play into the equation as the XXL is a lot more stove, but I am searching for something with higher BTU to err on the side of caution.
Enter the Bun Baker, which is rated at 65,000 BTU. The firebox is 19" W x 13" H x 11" D. 1.5cf. There was a detailed review of it, the owner was heating a 2 story 2400 sq ft house. They cut a hole in the floor above the stove to circulate the heat and say it is working amazingly well. They did not, however, share their location. Arizona vs Alberta?
I understand that if the firebox is larger you can fit more fuel and BTU in it. I do not understand how you can get more BTU out of a smaller firebox, so my concern is that the stove I am running now has the largest firebox of them all and is running hard at -20. Could the 65,000 BTU's be accurate or will I find the company has just over rated it and it won't be big enough either? Or, is it possible the stove I really want (number B) which they claim is under rated at heating 1500sf, and can heat larger well insulated spaces (ie- my new house) might actually suffice.
Hoping someone smarter than me can shed some light on things.
Cheers!