I occasionally buy a half ton load of soft coal to burn in my wood stove on cold nights of when I anticipate I will need an extended burn (overtime). Soft coal actually burns pretty good in modern EPA stoves with the secondary air system. This stuff should never see the inside of a catalytic stove or the catalyst will soon be toast. The products of the sulfur may be objectionable to someone downwind, but the only time I am able to notice at my place is right after I dump a bunch of coal onto a bed of glowing coals prior to them igniting.
There are some places (western states) where soft coal is far more abundant than wood, in particular hardwoods. To ignore this product doesn't seem right, considering that the vast majority of our electricity is made by burning the exact same stuff, and that is after having (the coal) freighted more than half way across the USA, and then having the electricity transferred down how many miles of high voltage lines to get to you. In the past, nobody considered the overall efficiency of this process, and in some cases entire subdivisions were developed around exclusively electrical power for everything including heat.
If wood is readily available or you can afford to buy it, then burn it. But soft coal can be burnt effectively, even though just about nobody makes a stove specifically designed to burn it. Anthracite has become expensive (over $385/Ton in Michigan) if you are too far away from the mines, particularly when considering the cost of diesel (and my opinion is that our truckers are being ***** by the oil companies and the government). So realistically, unless someone starts running trainloads of coal from PA Westwards and Eastwards and gets the entire supply chain back on the map, anthracite is not going to become more commonly available for the rest of us at something approaching competitive prices.
There are some places (western states) where soft coal is far more abundant than wood, in particular hardwoods. To ignore this product doesn't seem right, considering that the vast majority of our electricity is made by burning the exact same stuff, and that is after having (the coal) freighted more than half way across the USA, and then having the electricity transferred down how many miles of high voltage lines to get to you. In the past, nobody considered the overall efficiency of this process, and in some cases entire subdivisions were developed around exclusively electrical power for everything including heat.
If wood is readily available or you can afford to buy it, then burn it. But soft coal can be burnt effectively, even though just about nobody makes a stove specifically designed to burn it. Anthracite has become expensive (over $385/Ton in Michigan) if you are too far away from the mines, particularly when considering the cost of diesel (and my opinion is that our truckers are being ***** by the oil companies and the government). So realistically, unless someone starts running trainloads of coal from PA Westwards and Eastwards and gets the entire supply chain back on the map, anthracite is not going to become more commonly available for the rest of us at something approaching competitive prices.