For those with an add on wood furnace, I'm curious how much ash you normally get vs how much wood you're burning especially if you have a Drolet Heat Commander since that's what I'm considering. For many years, I've been reading about how great the high efficiency units are, and I've often noticed people mentioning that they don't get much ash left over with some saying the ash from the entire season would fit in a 5 gal bucket. When I hear claims like that, I often wonder what their conditions/circumstances are and whether or not I should expect similar results or not. My current wood furnace was made in 1980 and closely resembles a Clayton. Most years I burn roughly 3 cords of mostly hickory with some oak, ash, and locust mixed in, and on a typical year I normally produce 20 to 30 gal of ash. Reducing the ash would be nice, but chemically speaking I'm having a hard time understanding how a more efficient burn process would result in less ash. Less creosote buildup in the chimney makes sense, but ash is just the carbon that remains and that seems like it should remain consistent (ie a ton of seasoned wood should produce the same amount of ash regardless of species, volume, or what it's burned in).
Thanks,
Mark
Thanks,
Mark