fred wark said:
GOOSERIDER I suggest the installation of the TEE because it is usually easier to get into the TEE then it is to reach above the baffle from the front opening of the stove. Of course this is assuming that the cleanout cap of the TEE can be reached . It will be above the stove, and probably also be above, and behind the lintel. Ideally, for ease of maintanance, it would be located above the stove, below the lintel, with the cleanout facing in, towards the room, but most people might find this to be unsightly.
Depends on the stove... This is a discussion that has happened many times - seems that MOST (not all) top exit stoves are designed so that it's possible to remove enough of the secondary combustion guts to allow the debris to fall into the firebox, or otherwise easily get to and remove the debris from inside the stove and in that case the tee wouldn't be needed. Ditto for rear exit stoves because you will have a tee on the back of the stove, and it gives the cleanout function - usually there won't be any buildup on the short section between the stove and the tee since that section is hot enough to keep most creosote from building up, and burn off that which does.
I agree that the area between the pipe and the rest of the damper opening should be closed off for heat concerns. Usually I find that a loose layer of fiberglass (with paper backing removed) is adequate. This can easily be removed during flue cleaning for visual inspection of the pipe in the smoke chamber area. Of course that pipe should be stainless steel, and there should not be anything going wrong with it. The insulation will have a tendancy to fall out, and will have to be pushed back up into the smoke chamber occassionally.
MAJOR DISAGREEMENT ON THIS!
1. It is UNSAFE and a complete code violation! Standard house fiberglass is only good for about 600*, it is not rated for the temperature that a stove pipe / liner can reach, and is a potential fire hazard. (Mineral wool / rock wool insulation would be safe in this regard.)
2. It is NOT EFFECTIVE! Fiberglass (especially a loose layer) is NOT intended to stop air flow, and won't. The primary function of a blockoff plate is to STOP heated air from rising up the chimney between the liner and the existing flue, or prevent cold air from descending. You want to completely isolate the air in the chimney from the house interior, and fiberglass does NOT accomplish this. Fiberglass is one the "Mickey Mouse" techniques I mentioned earlier that should be considered an unacceptable practice. If you do a search on blockoff plates, you will find MANY threads where a customer had a stove installed, and a blockoff plate was not put in, and the customer came here complaining about not getting the heat he was expecting. When we got the customer to install a METAL blockoff plate, suddenly the problem dissapeared. Lack of a blockoff plate is probably our number one install related problem.
3. As you stated it falls out - this is not acceptable, especially since it can be difficult to put back in working around a hot stove, or the glass could land on the stove creating an even bigger fire hazard.
We do suggest that, especially in an exterior chimney, it can be helpful to put a layer of rock wool into the space above the blockoff plate to help prevent any possible convection losses, but it is definitely an optional thing, falls in the "overkill" department, but if the installer has extra insulation left over, it certainly does no harm and is a good way to use it up. The critical thing is that the metal plate be a tight seal around both the liner and the chimney flue or damper area where it's installed.
Make sure the pipe is supported at the top of the flue with a proper top plate and clamp assembly. You do not want all the weight of this liner pipe to be resting on the stove.
If the house is one story, hopefully the flue will go straight up. If the fireplace is in a lower level, with another fireplace directly above, the flue will possibly have at least one offset. This complicates the installation process. It involves the use of flexible pipe. Sometimes the pipes will not flex enough to go around serious enough offsets.
Very true, offsets can be a major headache. In a straight shot chimney, it can be possible to use either rigid or flex pipe, the rigid is maybe a little better but it tends to cost more, and the flex is quite acceptable. A combination approach can also be very effective - rigid for most of the way, but use 5-10' of flex on the bottom end to get around the damper and smoke shelf.
(to be continued)
Gooserider