I wish Harman would do something about the rotisserie sound. I think it's different than what is being described here. It is annoying. If I can figure out how to post a video to Youtube, I'll start a different thread.
newf lover said:I wish Harman would do something about the rotisserie sound. I think it's different than what is being described here. It is annoying. If I can figure out how to post a video to Youtube, I'll start a different thread.
PJPellet said:Harman definitely needs to keep working on this burnpot design. I have noticed that the fly ash is black instead of the typical grey-white. So the burn is not as clean as with the original pot. In all honesty I am thinking that I prefer the original pot. I DON"T miss the flutter but that is about the only improvement that I can see at this point. I wanted to pass this information along.
mepellet said:Any update on the burnbop redesign? I have been using up some misc. Maines Choice, Stove Chow and Green Supreme bags and interestingly the flutter/woofing came back once I started burning Green Supreme. I only had one bag left and when that was done switched back to Greene Team and the flutter/woofing went away. Must have been a fluke because I don't think it has to do with pellets.... The Green Supreme do make my stove crunch/pop when dumping pellets into the auger out of any other pellet I have tried. I think this has to do with the density of the pellet.
PJPellet said:mepellet said:Any update on the burnbop redesign? I have been using up some misc. Maines Choice, Stove Chow and Green Supreme bags and interestingly the flutter/woofing came back once I started burning Green Supreme. I only had one bag left and when that was done switched back to Greene Team and the flutter/woofing went away. Must have been a fluke because I don't think it has to do with pellets.... The Green Supreme do make my stove crunch/pop when dumping pellets into the auger out of any other pellet I have tried. I think this has to do with the density of the pellet.
Well, the update is that I am going to put the old burnpot back in the stove this summer. Here's why, the newer design is still in the design phase and therefore not perfected. While the woofing stopped, the burn has gotten dirtier and I just don't like the way the stove burns with the newer burnpot, I would rather have some woofing than what I have now. I spoke with my dealer and he passed along this info to Harman.
I think part of the reason for the burn being different is the fact that the burnpot gasket is not used with this newer design so the whole airflow of the system is thrown outta whack.
PJPellet said:I think part of the reason for the burn being different is the fact that the burnpot gasket is not used with this newer design so the whole airflow of the system is thrown outta whack.
Delta-T said:PJPellet said:I think part of the reason for the burn being different is the fact that the burnpot gasket is not used with this newer design so the whole airflow of the system is thrown outta whack.
who told you not to put the gasket on the burnpot??
After thinking about this woofing problem some more, I remembered something I did to my older P38 just prior to re-installing it in my basement of my new house. On the intake pipe there is a smal round flapper damper thing about an inch into the pipe which pivots on a small tab at the top. I removed this per a post I read a few years ago. This stove has not made the woofing noise once, regardless of the pellets used, whereas it used to do it occasionally at my old house. It seems to run exactly the same with or without this piece, minus the woofing. My new stove still woofs depending on the fuel used. I have not removed this flapper, assuming Harman still uses it. The dealer installed it and I never looked.
Has anyone else tried this simple mod?
Point taken, especially if one is not using an OAK and I'm not suggesting anyone do this for reasons stated above. I'm not sure if Harman redesigned this damper on newer stoves though. Mine was a loosely fitting lightweight piece that as far as CO and smoke in the event of a power failure goes, IMO wouldn't make much of a difference at all because of the gap around it. If I recall, it didn't seat against any sort of gasket either. I'm not a stove engineer so I'll stop speculating around Harman's design intentions.
Can anyone NOT using an OAK peek inside their intake WHILE the stove is woofing and see if the damper is in fact fluttering with the woofing? If it is, can you open the damper fully or try and stabilize it using a pencil or something?
If the woofing stops perhaps it needs to be weighted like a boiler damper does. I'm sure Harman already has the design of that area covered but who knows. Seems like it's worth a shot. I'd check it on my stove but its a corner install with minimum clearances and im too old and fat to get in there.
I remember reading somewhere that reducing the volume of incoming air also helped the woofing sound with an insert. I'll be darned if I can find it though.
I also remember reading that.
My main point is that this damper swung extremely easily. Possibly easily enough to start to oscillate CAUSING the woofing noise. It could also be a sympathetic oscillation caused by the woofing, which is in turn caused buy....well, that has yet to be determined I guess. That's why it would be appreciated if someone with access to a non OAK intake could check this out.
Hi, in my experimenting with everything I actually bought a new OAK intake and removed the flapper. And sadly that made no difference. I was convinced that it would because as you mentioned above the flapper swings easily and I noticed that it did move in time with the woofing, doing the "sympathetic oscillation" thing. But sadly it made no difference.
Also, while I had the OAK disconnected I ran the stove for a bit for more experimenting and I found that the woofing was MUCH worse with no OAK at all connected.
Hi, in my experimenting with everything I actually bought a new OAK intake and removed the flapper. And sadly that made no difference. I was convinced that it would because as you mentioned above the flapper swings easily and I noticed that it did move in time with the woofing, doing the "sympathetic oscillation" thing. But sadly it made no difference.
Also, while I had the OAK disconnected I ran the stove for a bit for more experimenting and I found that the woofing was MUCH worse with no OAK at all connected.
Pjpellet, just to clarify we're talking about the same flapper/damper piece....you are referring to the metal intake damper incorporated into the stove from the factory, correct? You mentioned you bought a new OAK intake and removed the flapper. I want to be sure you aren't referring to an intake mounted on the outside of the house, not unlike a dryer vent, which also has a similar design but with a reversed flapper.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.