Thought I'd share my take on these two stoves. We bought a Harman this year after using the Castle stove for the previous 6.
I miss the Castle stove.
Now it may seem a little odd that I prefer a $800 stove over a $4600 one but here is why: The Castle stove burned absolutely everything flawlessly with zero hiccups except one burnt out ignitor after four years. I could clean out the stove, pot, and fan within 20 minutes with just a vacuum and brush and be back to burning right away. The Harman takes multiple tools to clean out all the corners and requires removing different pieces to get behind and inside certain areas. By the time I am done my hands and arms and floors are covered in soot. It's a messy job. The Harman also would not burn one particular brand of pellets that the Castle had no issue with. The replacement brand seems to also give the Harman issues as the pellets are a bit long and keep blocking off the auger which shuts down the stove. This has happened multiple times and left the house cold while we were gone. The Castle's auger system did not get obstructed during all those years. We also noticed that we have 17 bags left and it's only mid February while with the Castle stove we would have a few bags remaining out of the same two ton pellet amount at the end of the season. Definitely going to need more pellets.
Now the P43 isn't a bad stove, it just doesn't perform like what we are used to. It is a better built stove, a bit quieter, and way better looking. Maybe I need a couple more years on it and my opinion may change. We will see. But overall I can say I prefer the Castle over the Harman just for what was stated above.
I miss the Castle stove.
Now it may seem a little odd that I prefer a $800 stove over a $4600 one but here is why: The Castle stove burned absolutely everything flawlessly with zero hiccups except one burnt out ignitor after four years. I could clean out the stove, pot, and fan within 20 minutes with just a vacuum and brush and be back to burning right away. The Harman takes multiple tools to clean out all the corners and requires removing different pieces to get behind and inside certain areas. By the time I am done my hands and arms and floors are covered in soot. It's a messy job. The Harman also would not burn one particular brand of pellets that the Castle had no issue with. The replacement brand seems to also give the Harman issues as the pellets are a bit long and keep blocking off the auger which shuts down the stove. This has happened multiple times and left the house cold while we were gone. The Castle's auger system did not get obstructed during all those years. We also noticed that we have 17 bags left and it's only mid February while with the Castle stove we would have a few bags remaining out of the same two ton pellet amount at the end of the season. Definitely going to need more pellets.
Now the P43 isn't a bad stove, it just doesn't perform like what we are used to. It is a better built stove, a bit quieter, and way better looking. Maybe I need a couple more years on it and my opinion may change. We will see. But overall I can say I prefer the Castle over the Harman just for what was stated above.