EKO External Primary Air Controller

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Hope everyone has a wonderful and warm Thanksgiving!
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.
sled_mack said:
Hmmmm.... maybe just one fan is a decent thing to try. There is a flap at the back of the fan, so it's shouldn't allow too much air to escape.

Right now I'm at about 10mm primary, somewhere around 2 to 3 turns secondary, and about 1/2 inch open on each fan.

Just out of curiosity, why would you expect better efficiency from one fan versus two?

My thought was that I'd have better modulation control with the cover if using only one fan, and maybe a little more foregiveness in the setting of the cover. I wasn't expecting to need to make any ratio adjustments, but there is a lot about this burn process that I still have to learn.

First of all I am not an expert but my thinking on one fan being more efficient versus two is the amount of air supplied will not be traveling at the same velocity and pressure because the volume will be less. With your blower settings currently cut so far back you are not only reducing volume you are also reducing pressure if there are no obstructions in the path of the air. Obstructions would be wood/coals over the nozzle and reduced settings for primary and secondary air. Air entering the primary chamber is by design going to exit the nozzle at a lower velocity than it entered the chamber because the nozzle is a larger opening than the combined openings for the primary air inlet at least until coals/wood begin to cover the nozzle. If all things are equal the air entering the primary chamber will exit at the same speed. If there is a 50% reduction in the area that the gasses exit the primary chamber in comparison to the area the air enters the primary chamber the primary chamber will pressurize (back up until the source of the pressure stops or the restriction is removed or burned out). The pressurization of the primary chamber increases pressure on the secondary air supply because the fan is still producing the same amount of air that now has fewer places to go, and forces greater velocity through the secondary air exit (flow equalization) if the secondary air channel is the path of least resistance (adjustment is the factor here). Once the velocity of either the primary air or the secondary air gets too high the mix for the best burn will suffer as pockets of air or gas will shoot through the mix and either cool the gasses or leave the gasses in too thin of a mix to burn (secondary supply) or slip through the gaps in the secondary ports and be too rich to burn (primary gasses) until the gasses can mix as they spread (generally a cooler orange flame) out on their way to the heat tube and chimney. Two blowers have a greater potential for over pressurization. In your set up by reducing the available air for the burn you have demonstrated that two blowers are not currently needed for your mix setting (a change in settings could require two fans). One 20 cfm blower cannot supply the volume of two 20 cfm blowers. (arbitrary number) So in theory the mix is more apt to be more equally disbursed at the critical time and place for greatest heat generation because the air flow is gentler. One blower will not create pressurization spikes as quickly as two and should give a more regulated overall flow of air. The gasification burn process is always in a state of flux so exact equalization is not going to exist for 100% of the burn, it's too volatile, but the closer we get to balance and not spike the closer we get to regulated controlled burns. Sorry to be windy...it's late.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.