Agreed.fishboat said:What Warren is seeing is the result of the physics angle of heating mass...warm always seeks cold. If your walls, floor, ceiling...get appreciably cooled off then even if the air temp is warm(say, if you crank the furnace on to warm things up quickly) you will still feel cold. This happens due to your body radiating infrared heat to the cold walls(in physics terms you're acting as a black-body radiator). Well insulated houses feel warmer not only due to the lack of outside air drafts, but in a large part due to the surfaces inside the home being maintained at a higher relative temp.
If you crunch the numbers on the heat required to raise the temp of X pounds of sheetrock Y number of degrees and compare that to the amount of heat required to maintain the sheetrock at some temp (just offsetting the heat loss to the outside), the cool down, heat up, cool down, heat up, cool down cycle sucks up considerably more heat/fuel...while being less comfortable during the transitions.
Yes, but that may not describe the situation in a completely relevant way. If I only spend, say, 7 waking hours in the space contained by said mass... and most of it is in well less than half of said space... it is certainly not efficient to keep it constantly in the comfort zone. A radiant heater will easily swamp the effect of the initially cooler walls, and the energy not expended in those 17 hours is not sucked up anywhere.
The way I view it, I'm maintaining a constant temp of 63 and adding additional btu's into the occupied living space as needed. And you must agree, it's cheaper to maintain 63 than it is 70...