In NL they have barns where the waste is put in a closed cellar immediately, to avoid ammonia from being released in the environment. (Nitrogen concentrations are too high in the country due to the highly-dense animal farming in NL.) Turns out they don't work well. I surmise that dairy barns are also not closed well enough for collection of methane that is pure enough for it to be an economically viable process.I remember reading of experiments with collecting methane from dairy barns, at least 10 - 15 years ago. Obviously doesn't help when they're out of doors, and I don't know if this idea ever transitioned from research experiments to commercial usage, but it was interesting nonetheless.
As I understand it, the majority of the methane emissions comes from ruminants belching. What's funny is, deer, sheep, goats etc are ruminants but you never hear blame put on them.Are the majority of gasses of concern (eg. methane, co2) coming directly off the animals, or from their excrement?
I suspect that's due to the unnatural population densities created by commercial farming, although I'm not going to argue that every household having their own cow tied to the rear porch would be better. There's always economy in scale.As I understand it, the majority of the methane emissions comes from ruminants belching. What's funny is, deer, sheep, goats etc are ruminants but you never hear blame put on them.
Yep, 3000+ head dairy farms and 100k beef feedlots come to mind. I agree with you on both of your other points also.I suspect that's due to the unnatural population densities created by commercial farming, although I'm not going to argue that every household having their own cow tied to the rear porch would be better. There's always economy in scale.
For sure, just look at the USDA slaughter report and it will show you that. I wonder what it looks like in other countries though. In India I'd expect very few cows slaughtered but a higher amount of sheep and goats. A cow weighs about 10 times what a sheep or goat does so they have to eat 10 times as much as feed ( roughly 1 - 3% of their body weight a day in dry matter ) also.I think the number of cows is so far larger than goats and sheep (not sure about deer - see the remarks by Ashful on another thread...), and their body size means their methane production is so far larger than that of a goat, sheep, and deer, that the total methane output by cows is very much larger than the total output by the other ruminants.
Guess my point was, the finger is always pointed at cattle when there are other animals that are producing methane also. Are cows the biggest culprits when it comes to methane producing animals, I would say yes, but are they the only ones, no.
I agree, as a planet we need to eat less meat.
I'm way ahead of you, begreen. We just need to milk the termites, and eliminate the cows!Eventually, cow burps will be a moot point. No one has figured out how to control methane emissions from termites estimated at 20 million tons a year. And then there is the melting permafrost problem, hydrates storing massive amounts of methane.
Headed out the door to retrieve the kids from school. They will get a kick out of this one. The 12-year old in me had a chuckle over it.think of cow with a 100 watt lightbulb in its butt, that's is the typical output from the digester, a hog had a 20 watts lightbulb and a chicken was somewhere around 3 watts.
Point being that emissions from human activity, excluding ruminants, are still increasing. If that is not addressed and the global tipping point is reached, then cows are the least of our problems. (FWIW, I get just over 1 billion cows in searches).If I did not make a mistake in the math here I posit that in fact this is NOT a moot point. This is significant enough.
(The problem is that a change in this will be small because we're not going to abandon all 1.5 billion cows.)
Down to beef about 2-3 times a month. It’s probably been replaced by pork and turkey. I’m definitely pretty much done with regular hamburger. Traded for higher end cuts. (Sirloin top cap is way better than burger!)Point being that emissions from human activity, excluding ruminants, are still increasing. If that is not addressed and the global tipping point is reached, then cows are the least of our problems. (FWIW, I get just over 1 billion cows in searches).
Corking up a billion cows is no trivial task so maybe we just wipe out half of them and stop eating so much beef? (Note this does not address the over 1 billion sheep we are shepherding.) I say this with tongue in cheek, but it's not just the cow burps, but the huge amount of acreage under industrial agriculture that feeds them. Not to mention the Amazon forests that are steadily being decimated for this purpose. Ready to stop eating beef?
How Many Cows Are In The World? | Farming Base
Ever wondered how many cows are in the world? There is a lot of speculation surrounding cattle population, people find it hard to know the exact figure.farmingbase.com
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.