mepellet
Minister of Fire
lbcynya said:mepellet said:j-takeman said:I'd check it where you normally run it. How often do you crank it to the max? I never do, I normally run right where I have been checking mine. If It gets colder the heat should be linear. So if I crank it the hotter pellet will still be hotter than the others.
With the Harman control boards they are dials. I think getting the same exact dial position would be difficult. We could "eyeball it" but it isn't like other stoves that has 3 exact settings. Know what mean? I never use the highest setting. Usually at or under half capacity on average.
Guys, the only way you can test pellets in a Harman is based on time, not temperature. Problem is, if you go by bag (40 lbs) the long period it would take to burn introduce too many variables to which will marginalize the effort. If you have to tinker, then it would be best if you set the stove to stove temp and feed rate, then drop in 3 pounds of a particular brand and measure the time it takes to consume all the pellets. Don't change any settings and repeat with a different brand. You can then extrapolate the differences and determine whether the extra cost gives sufficient extra time.
Or, you can simply take J-Takemans reviews and buy what seems to make sense to you from his hard efforts.
I think we all realize that the only way you can compare pellets with the Harman's control board is based on time. I was one of the ones that pointed that out.
https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/85940/
What happened to Johnny anyway? Did he run away after realizing that his avatar was in jeopardy?