B Smithers
New Member
Keep arguing but................. http://extension.psu.edu/natural-re...lled-corn/heat-energy-content-of-shelled-corn
Corn is more uniform than pellets so it stands to reason that you would be able to feed more POUNDS/HR which would translate into more BTU/HR, which leads you to believe that corn is hotter. So you really are looking at feeding the same heat content per pound material at a higher rate. You just use more pounds per hour. This is the same phenomenon that leads to the misnomer of 'hotter' pellets.
Interesting read, thanks for posting. The feed rate being higher due to shape and size of the fuel is noteworthy as well, as far as "pounds per hour", I have never taken the time to estimate, I just know it seems the hopper always needs filled using corn or pellets. I understand I am posting on a pellet forum so "Argue" May not have been the best choice of words. I will leave it at per my experience in the several years I have had multi fuel stoves I have found that I get more heat(room air) out of corn than I have out of any pellet that I have had in the hopper.