"Chief" hydraulic cylinders; anyone using them?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here

9Fingers

Member
Mar 27, 2014
7
New England
I'm building a splitter and comparing cylinders. Boils down to Prince or Chief, 5" bore. Difference is port size. Prince is SAE 10, about a 5/8" ID vs. the Chief with SAE 12, a 3/4" ID. Valves will be from Northern and have 3/4" ports. 22GPM pump and 18 hp briggs industrial engine that I have on hand.
Prince is a well known name, available lots of places, Chief not so much. View the specs here:

(broken link removed)

Not too many 3/4" ported cylinders to chose from.

Any thoughts?
 
I wonder if I'll see any performance issues with the bush down. A small bit of cycle speed I suppose, going from 3/4 down to 5/8. I know that the smaller you make your plumbing, the higher your temperatures will be for a given flow. I know I'd really see a difference if I went down to a 1/2" port.
 
I run a prince on my home built unit. It has been working flawless for quite a few years now. That said, I don't know of any bad reviews on the Chief brand.

The difference in port size won't really make any difference in cycle time. It will actually raise the resistance a bit, which leads to a bit higher pressure/heat. Most likely if you have a large enough oil reservoir you won't even notice it.

On my little splitter (for clarification - I have 3 splitters) I run a 16gpm pump through 3/8" ports with no ill effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevin j
the larger the ports the faster you can fill empty cylinder - that is what relates to cycle time in that area. also larger ports lines mean less friction, friction = heat , excessive heat is bad for hydraulics. your valve is 3/4 so might as well stay with 3/4 lines and ports on cylinder why mess around downsizing it. added expense for reducers and more areas for potential leaks. use the Kiss principal ( keep it simple stu.....) Northern tool has pre made lines at reasonable prices ( course depends on your location and shipping if needed) If you need to turn something use 45 deg hi flow elbows rather than 90's if at all possible.
 
I have written about port sizing before, but to keep it simple, smaller ports make more heat and heat is wasted power. A smaller port size CAN reduce your cycle times. The heat is part of the evidence. I open up and contour the ports on cylinders and have been doing it for years. It helps keep temps down and can boost cycle times. Am I splitting hairs? Maybe. I just like my stuff to work right and be in the best shape possible. My splitter motor is anything but stock. :)
 
I bought a commercial AllWood splitter a couple years ago and use it pretty hard. It came with a Chief main cylinder...it takes care of business...no complaints...
[Hearth.com] "Chief" hydraulic cylinders; anyone using them?
 
SAE-10 is fine for 22 GPM, but if you see yourself ever wanting to hotrod that splitter with a really big pump, then SAE-12 ports may become a requirement.

What is your engine size or horsepower?
 
Just came back to this thread after a long hiatus. 18 horse and 22 GPM as stated in my first post. I did build it and am very happy with it. No issues at all with the Chief cylinder. I run the engine at perhaps 30-40% RPM as it's an old engine and I'm getting to be an older guy. I'm not in a big hurry these days. Having the work table at a good height and with a vertical ram so everything is waist high or a bit above has really saved my back over the last couple of years. It has a side lift and that is worth it's weight in gold, in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VirginiaIron
Glad to hear you used the bigger stuff. I am upgrading mine to a 22hp and 28 gpm pump, and I need to upsize my lines and ports. I have 3/8 feeding the return side and 1/2 feeding the pressure side, so I have some work to do. Glad yours works great!