I am finally getting around to finishing the setup of the hydronic system for my house. Hoping some of the experts here can weigh in on their opinions.
Some background info. I have a large/old house, if done the traditional way it would consist of 3 different furnace/aircon units in the 3-4 ton cooling and 70k+ BTU heating each and I would have to have bulkheads everywhere to hide all the duct-work (then add the whole issue of how to hook wood heat into it). It is far easier to have a wood boiler, 200k BTU boiler (backup), and two 5 ton aircon units hooked up to chiller coils driving a hydronic system for the whole house. Overall costs is cheaper too. Planning on using either a Boiler Buddy 119g hydraulic separator / buffer tank or something similar. House is large so it is easy to dump heat or cool ..somewhere.. so storage is not necessary. Its more to act as a small buffer to prevent short cycling the AC units during mild spring/fall days and do double duty as a hydraulic separator between the primary/secondary loops.
The setup:
-5 fan coils (sized for cooling, thus over-sized for heating)
-baseboard radiators near some large groups of windows that are always cold
-radiant flooring mostly used to provide baseline heat (~50% of needed heat load) since it is staple up under existing wood floor.
-in two rooms that are absolutely baked by the sun in the summer, the radiant floor would also have cool water run through to take some of the latent heat load out of the room...when sunny the heat load in these two rooms is about 1.5 tons each.
-the radiant floor would be run through a mixing valve, the other zones are piped direct to the secondary loop
-Delta-T in heating mode is between 15-20* for the fan coils and baseboards
-Delta-T for the radiant floor would vary much more since it is behind a mixing valve
-Delta-T in cooling mode is 10-12*
This setup has one big problem that I am trying to figure out how to solve in the best way possible. Almost the whole system is switched between heating and cooling modes and there is a buffer tank in the middle that will stratify somewhat.
1) If I arrange the piping so the boiler/chiller feed the top of the tank and the secondary pulls water from the top, it works real well for heating but in cooling mode it would put cold source water on top and warmer return water on bottom.
2) If I arrange the piping in reverse, it works well for cooling mode but is backwards for heating.
3) I can put 3-way "L" valves on the secondary side to flip the source/return to the tank. The one big downside is that in order to switch between heating/cooling it would require manually turning two valves. The primary side is easier since the boilers and chillers would have different pumps and they could just be plumbed differently. (the boiler pump could theoretically suck water through the chiller primary circuit, but the resistance because of the pump/check valve/coil would probably reduce it to only very minimal)
One big question I have with rather low Delta-T's and a relatively small tank, is having the tank plumbed for heating mode and cooling being inversed (cold water on top, warmer return on bottom) going to cause much of a problem at all? The tank is not there to store anything, only as a thermal buffer to keep the chillers from short cycling on lower load days (same with the boiler, just to a much less extent)
I know its not the typical boiler question, but appreciative of any thoughts or opinions that anyone may have.
Below are simplified diagrams showing only one boiler/chiller/fan coil/etc. There are check valves after each pump. First one is the simple-piping method that is set up for heating mode. Second one is the one with 3-way valves to 'flip' the secondary side between heating/cooling.
Some background info. I have a large/old house, if done the traditional way it would consist of 3 different furnace/aircon units in the 3-4 ton cooling and 70k+ BTU heating each and I would have to have bulkheads everywhere to hide all the duct-work (then add the whole issue of how to hook wood heat into it). It is far easier to have a wood boiler, 200k BTU boiler (backup), and two 5 ton aircon units hooked up to chiller coils driving a hydronic system for the whole house. Overall costs is cheaper too. Planning on using either a Boiler Buddy 119g hydraulic separator / buffer tank or something similar. House is large so it is easy to dump heat or cool ..somewhere.. so storage is not necessary. Its more to act as a small buffer to prevent short cycling the AC units during mild spring/fall days and do double duty as a hydraulic separator between the primary/secondary loops.
The setup:
-5 fan coils (sized for cooling, thus over-sized for heating)
-baseboard radiators near some large groups of windows that are always cold
-radiant flooring mostly used to provide baseline heat (~50% of needed heat load) since it is staple up under existing wood floor.
-in two rooms that are absolutely baked by the sun in the summer, the radiant floor would also have cool water run through to take some of the latent heat load out of the room...when sunny the heat load in these two rooms is about 1.5 tons each.
-the radiant floor would be run through a mixing valve, the other zones are piped direct to the secondary loop
-Delta-T in heating mode is between 15-20* for the fan coils and baseboards
-Delta-T for the radiant floor would vary much more since it is behind a mixing valve
-Delta-T in cooling mode is 10-12*
This setup has one big problem that I am trying to figure out how to solve in the best way possible. Almost the whole system is switched between heating and cooling modes and there is a buffer tank in the middle that will stratify somewhat.
1) If I arrange the piping so the boiler/chiller feed the top of the tank and the secondary pulls water from the top, it works real well for heating but in cooling mode it would put cold source water on top and warmer return water on bottom.
2) If I arrange the piping in reverse, it works well for cooling mode but is backwards for heating.
3) I can put 3-way "L" valves on the secondary side to flip the source/return to the tank. The one big downside is that in order to switch between heating/cooling it would require manually turning two valves. The primary side is easier since the boilers and chillers would have different pumps and they could just be plumbed differently. (the boiler pump could theoretically suck water through the chiller primary circuit, but the resistance because of the pump/check valve/coil would probably reduce it to only very minimal)
One big question I have with rather low Delta-T's and a relatively small tank, is having the tank plumbed for heating mode and cooling being inversed (cold water on top, warmer return on bottom) going to cause much of a problem at all? The tank is not there to store anything, only as a thermal buffer to keep the chillers from short cycling on lower load days (same with the boiler, just to a much less extent)
I know its not the typical boiler question, but appreciative of any thoughts or opinions that anyone may have.
Below are simplified diagrams showing only one boiler/chiller/fan coil/etc. There are check valves after each pump. First one is the simple-piping method that is set up for heating mode. Second one is the one with 3-way valves to 'flip' the secondary side between heating/cooling.