Barometric Damper for Wood Stove- Correct me if I'm wrong

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
  • Super Cedar firestarters 30% discount Use code Hearth2024 Click here
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been rethinking this whole subject and haven't come to any conclusions of my own yet.

Without question, overdraft situations exist and have to be (or should be) dealt with... the standard remedy being the manual flue damper.

I'm using one now, but still think I'm sending more heat up the chimney than I should be. I've considered adding a second damper a bit further up the flue from the stove... but frankly, I think they're 'inelegant' to begin with and it seems like there really ort to be a better way.

The baro damper approach has known problems/tradeoffs. The heat reclaimer has known problems/tradeoffs.

Ideally, if an EPA stove is operated properly, there should be little or no creosote deposition except on fire startup and 'cool' reload. At other times, pretty much throughout the burn cycle, there shouldn't be a lot.

If I had an EPA stove and a bulletproof chimney, I'd be tempted to try either of the 'frowned-on' alternatives to the manual damper.

In fact, if there was a way to condense most/all of the creosote in the black pipe immediately above the stove - and prevent (most) deposition above - I would rest easy burning HOT any time I chose to... burn out the lower pipe and go on about my bizness.

My own 'research' into aluminum heat sinks came to a dead end, but I found these images that might fire other folks' imaginations. The heat sink idea - leaving the flue the same brushable ID, unfettered with additional creo catching surfaces - still appeals to me... but I don't have a ready way of testing the theory.

Presumably, the cooling of flue temps would help precipitate creosote and (likely ?) slow the draft itself... presumably.

Simply increasing the ID of the flue immediately above the stove might also slow the draft velocity... but the volume 'moved' (I think) would increase... and the larger pipe could not be readily brushed clean without disassembly.

Oh... just dreamin'.

Peter B.

-----
 

Attachments

  • [Hearth.com] Barometric Damper for Wood Stove- Correct me if I'm wrong
    sink1.webp
    25.1 KB · Views: 398
  • [Hearth.com] Barometric Damper for Wood Stove- Correct me if I'm wrong
    sink2.webp
    69.6 KB · Views: 403
  • [Hearth.com] Barometric Damper for Wood Stove- Correct me if I'm wrong
    sink3.webp
    8.3 KB · Views: 374
Cool debating with the MAN!

ok if the flue has a draft regulator in it. Would it not run slower as you are mixing cold air to the flue gases thus the flues gas temps would drop.Therefore the draft would become weaker or slower not faster?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.