My wife and I recently bought a home. This will be our first winter here, and we had no idea about this prior to purchase, but our wood stove doesn't even have a trace on the internet, and we don't have a manual for it. According to another post on this forum (and the only other person I can tell that has one) it's from the 80's. We had everything inspected and cleaned and they told us everything passes and it's fully usable, so we wanted to give it a go this winter to try to offset the cost of heating. Electricity heating looks like it would cost us $300+/mo for Dec/Jan/Feb/Mar, so I turned to our wood stove to see if it could save us some money.
The problem is, it seems to be pretty inefficient, but maybe I'm the issue. I ran it yesterday for the day to try to learn how to operate it optimally and ended up burning through about 1.6 cubic feet of wood (19 split logs) in the span of about 8-10 hours. This seems super inefficient to me, as I had to add a couple more logs every hour. I even tried to add 5 at a time and it still only burnt for a single hour, just hotter. My strategy was to let it combust, then I would cut the air intake back to virtually nothing, sometimes even completely shut, and closing the flue to about 3/4 the way closed.
For reference, we live in Canada, it's relatively cold where we live (Montreal). We're able to find a face cord of wood here for ~$120 (fun fact, they just call it a cord here, and it's the only way people sell it). I'm really at a crossroads, do we just tough it out and use electric heat this winter and save up to replace it, or do we use it occasionally to offset the cost of the electric heating? I'm leaning towards the latter. I wanted to only use wood heat, but it's so inefficient compared to the newer wood inserts that I just can't bring myself to waste that much wood.
Is there anyone here that has advice for us in this situation? I need to buy wood now if we're going to go this route, and I'm considering 4 (face) cords, just to help us heat a little during the day/evening during the winter. Also, I've attached a couple photos of the fireplace.
Edit: I should probably specify that our house is 2 stories (basement and main floor), about 2,000 sq ft, and the heat from the fireplace does pretty well at getting up to the main floor.
The problem is, it seems to be pretty inefficient, but maybe I'm the issue. I ran it yesterday for the day to try to learn how to operate it optimally and ended up burning through about 1.6 cubic feet of wood (19 split logs) in the span of about 8-10 hours. This seems super inefficient to me, as I had to add a couple more logs every hour. I even tried to add 5 at a time and it still only burnt for a single hour, just hotter. My strategy was to let it combust, then I would cut the air intake back to virtually nothing, sometimes even completely shut, and closing the flue to about 3/4 the way closed.
For reference, we live in Canada, it's relatively cold where we live (Montreal). We're able to find a face cord of wood here for ~$120 (fun fact, they just call it a cord here, and it's the only way people sell it). I'm really at a crossroads, do we just tough it out and use electric heat this winter and save up to replace it, or do we use it occasionally to offset the cost of the electric heating? I'm leaning towards the latter. I wanted to only use wood heat, but it's so inefficient compared to the newer wood inserts that I just can't bring myself to waste that much wood.
Is there anyone here that has advice for us in this situation? I need to buy wood now if we're going to go this route, and I'm considering 4 (face) cords, just to help us heat a little during the day/evening during the winter. Also, I've attached a couple photos of the fireplace.
Edit: I should probably specify that our house is 2 stories (basement and main floor), about 2,000 sq ft, and the heat from the fireplace does pretty well at getting up to the main floor.
Attachments
Last edited: