Don2222 said:
Hello Woodgeek
I have an idea. We should have a document up top that addresses this issue, that the moderators can refer to in the future.
Stating that this is against code, when it has not been proven, is not a way to settle the debate.
Codes vary from state to state and listing all the states and their exact code should not be this forum's responsibility!!
We should however assure members that Hearth.com is not recommending this procedure and list the cautions and engineering to consider if undergoing this type of modification.
This would have everyone on the same page and protect hearth.com and it's members.
So a document written with the issues at this time and a disclaimer would be really nice to have!
P.S.
I did not need a higher CFM fan because I only ducted half the stove output to half as many registers as the other guy.
Also the inline blower was added to make it very efficient and yes I do have a CO Alarm.
I was always sure you were being safe, but I also think we have to be cautious when giving advice in a public forum.
I think the forum works pretty well as it is....but there are different agenda:
1--We want to guide newbs to safe and satisfying experiences with woodburning.
2--We want to share our positive and negative outocmes as experienced woodburners.
3--We want to share the results and advise the tinkering and innovating process as 'hobbyists'.
For #1, we need to keep a simple, uniform message, e.g.
--do adhere to the manual,
--do adhere to a uniform (international) building code,
--don't use liquid accelerants,
--don't leave the door open and walk away
For #3, we **are** going to break some of the rules, and by discussing the issues together, get a good and safe outcome.
Your suggestion makes sense, but I am afraid that a lot of casual readers coming to the forum from a google search will get the #3 advice, and never see the blanket warning. I don't think the mods are trying to insult you or saying you are def doing something unsafe--I think they are 'balancing' your message in a way to make naive readers wary. And I expect that that is one of their primary mandated functions on the board, and they do it with a pretty light touch.