I'm installing a new 3-ton heat pump and am trying to plan the installation of the indoor unit (air handler with heat strips) and its connection to the existing ductwork.
This scale drawing shows the location of the existing ductwork and my proposed location for the new air handler. (The air handler is shown without any elbows or square-to-round transitions that may be added to it to interface with the ductwork).
The old air handler was mounted so that the airflow was upwards (in the drawing), with the outlet flowing directly into a big rectangular elbow that leads up into the bottom of the supply trunk (roughly at its mid-point).
The inlet ductwork was far complex that shown here (legacy of an even earlier system) and I'd measured an unacceptably-high inlet-side static pressure of 0.5-0.6". I ripped all that out so that the stack from the return-air grill (mounted in a hallway of the house) comes straight down where I'll install an 18" starting collar and an elbow pointing towards the air handler. A short run of 18" flex-duct will lead to a round-to-square transition at the inlet to the air handler. This will be a significant improvement, with the return air path being both shorter and larger diameter.
But it occurs to me that I could do better, either by mounting the air handler with the air flow from right-to-left (in the drawing), or diagonally as shown here. I seek opinions on these options. Either option will make the return air path even shorter, at the expense of adding an elbow (with angle between 45 and 90 degrees) to the supply side path. It seems to me that it's the total airflow resistance (and thus static pressure) that's important, and if I can reduce the total by reducing the return side at the expense of the supply side, it's a good thing.
Of course this would also require fabricating that big elbow (that goes from the air handler outlet to the existing elbow that leads up into the supply trunk), but I assume that's easy enough for the moonlighting cryogenic tech friend who's helping. I'm run this by him too, of course, but though he's an ace with refrigeration I'm not sure he's that good on ducting.
This scale drawing shows the location of the existing ductwork and my proposed location for the new air handler. (The air handler is shown without any elbows or square-to-round transitions that may be added to it to interface with the ductwork).
The old air handler was mounted so that the airflow was upwards (in the drawing), with the outlet flowing directly into a big rectangular elbow that leads up into the bottom of the supply trunk (roughly at its mid-point).
The inlet ductwork was far complex that shown here (legacy of an even earlier system) and I'd measured an unacceptably-high inlet-side static pressure of 0.5-0.6". I ripped all that out so that the stack from the return-air grill (mounted in a hallway of the house) comes straight down where I'll install an 18" starting collar and an elbow pointing towards the air handler. A short run of 18" flex-duct will lead to a round-to-square transition at the inlet to the air handler. This will be a significant improvement, with the return air path being both shorter and larger diameter.
But it occurs to me that I could do better, either by mounting the air handler with the air flow from right-to-left (in the drawing), or diagonally as shown here. I seek opinions on these options. Either option will make the return air path even shorter, at the expense of adding an elbow (with angle between 45 and 90 degrees) to the supply side path. It seems to me that it's the total airflow resistance (and thus static pressure) that's important, and if I can reduce the total by reducing the return side at the expense of the supply side, it's a good thing.
Of course this would also require fabricating that big elbow (that goes from the air handler outlet to the existing elbow that leads up into the supply trunk), but I assume that's easy enough for the moonlighting cryogenic tech friend who's helping. I'm run this by him too, of course, but though he's an ace with refrigeration I'm not sure he's that good on ducting.