I've got all Condars on everyone's stove, but I picked up the jumbo Meeco at the farm store at one point, and put it on one of my BIL's stoves. I took it back though....it's easy to see in my setup, lying on the tee take-off back in the fireplace.
I pretty much ignore the 'zone' designations, and focus on the temp. This is about the least obnoxious-looking Condar or Rutland I've seen:
View attachment 125594
Exactly, looks are one thing, accuracy is another, and the burn zones are yet another factor.
I hate the rutlands mostly because I had 3 fail in short order personally, but also because that averaged temperature scale could cause an inexperienced burner to consistently run their stove too cool for fear that they were overfiring things based on the craptastic scale. As a consequence, creosote deposits in the chimney, increased risk of a chimney fire, poor heating capabilities, throwing things into snow banks, etc.
My cousin made a brand new chimney (double wall up to the appropriate thimble, and class A from there up) GLOW near the thimble (I'm still impressed that this is even possible) on his first fire of the season after moving this stove and putting a new chimney up this fall.
What scared him about the scenario is he had started the stove as he had last season and the stove top wasn't even to 400 yet when this happened. (Is a coal stove burning wood in it).
I brought him a probe thermometer that I do not use because of the aesthetics and had him insert it. It changed the way he burned significantly on start-up for the better.
Point is, all thermometers if accurate, measure temp at a given place. It's up to the user to use what information they have to ensure what they are doing is safe regardless of what that thermometer says. The problem comes with the learning curve to get there, and that some installations allow less opportunity for measuring devices to help with this.
As BB said, the pipe thermometer might be the way of the manual typewriter, however, with a cruising stove, it reads correctly (if placed in the right position). My grandfather's thermometer he purchased some time decades ago still reads accurately on the pipe, however, somewhere along the line, he learned that it may read a bit higher than the safe zone on on startup and to not pay attention to it then, what was important for his way of running that stove was what it read during a cruise situation (he never ran a stove top thermometer).
Since this all becomes rather commonplace with experience, it's easy to become dismissive. However, I have a lady at home who is willing to run the stove when I'm gone and I do what I can to make sure things are safe and easy for her (and for me so I don't get a phone call in the night when I'm gone!). That said, I installed a condar flue meter that looks like this
(broken image removed)
and placed it up the pipe so that when the stove top thermometer reads "redline" AT CRUISE this does as well. The two have been consistent for 3 years now. Not all setups have this availability, but mine does so I use it. By setting it this way, it easily lets me or the Mrs. know if things are firing too quickly and the stove pipe is getting too hot before the stove warms up, or the opposite, if we turn the air down too soon and the pipe starts to cool while the stove is too hot letting us know things are about to stall.
In all, it's a learning curve but I'm of the opinion if the setup allows more room for more information to be gathered, then have at it.
I have an IR thermometer that I like to use to verify things, but for checking on the stove while running past it 20x in the morning while it's warming up and we are getting ready for work, school, etc., or when fixing dinner in the evening, it's a pain in the rear to use compared to a magnetic that is always there and easy to glance at.
pen