Replacement air coming in is the issue, if the fireplace has its own fresh air intake then it would be better for the room, without it then the cold air gets drawn in from any cracks, poorly insulated spaces like plug outlets, doors & windows, the air then comes across the room and cools it down, also the hot air coming from the fire is less dense so it rises up the path of least resistance which is the chimney and creates a convective loop drawing in more cold denser air to backfill.I've proven every word in my original post. I don't know why you are too stubborn to either admit it, or ignore it. Look up the word "heater." Look up the word "phenomenal." It's not hard.
I didn't make comparisons to stoves.
The heat output, per pound of wood, is much higher from a stove than a fireplace.more than any stove.
I was wondering about an OAK thing. How much air would have to be piped in to the fireplace, from a window (or wall) for ex. I'm thinking of a tube? Would it have to be huge in diameter? Any thoughts would be interesting. ThanksReplacement air coming in is the issue, if the fireplace has its own fresh air intake then it would be better for the room, without it then the cold air gets drawn in from any cracks, poorly insulated spaces like plug outlets, doors & windows, the air then comes across the room and cools it down, also the hot air coming from the fire is less dense so it rises up the path of least resistance which is the chimney and creates a convective loop drawing in more cold denser air to backfill.
If you like fireplaces check out masonry heaters, or Russian heaters, they captivate my mind and look like pieces of fine art to me.
It would have to be roughly 60% of the flue volume.I was wondering about an OAK thing. How much air would have to be piped in to the fireplace, from a window (or wall) for ex. I'm thinking of a tube? Would it have to be huge in diameter? Any thoughts would be interesting. Thanks
You are spot on about most homes today. My kids think I am nuts when I point out that most newer homes don't even have a chimney of any sort. If the hearth is missing, I wouldn't want to live there.I think ideally for me a dream home would have 1. Woodburner/stove for practical heating 2. One traditional fireplace for enjoyment novelty effect . I’d rather have either than nothing like most homes built now a days in the advent of a power outrage mid winter
Thank you. I guess that won't be practical to say the least.It would have to be roughly 60% of the flue volume.
Im sure there is a standard in relation to fireplace size but I would assume that a 4" pipe is more then enough, if it isnt your still substantially reducing the amount of makeup air just by having the pipe there which means a warmer room.I was wondering about an OAK thing. How much air would have to be piped in to the fireplace, from a window (or wall) for ex. I'm thinking of a tube? Would it have to be huge in diameter? Any thoughts would be interesting. Thanks
Thanks for getting both comments in one.The heat output, per pound of wood, is much higher from a stove than a fireplace.
4" wouldn't do a thingIm sure there is a standard in relation to fireplace size but I would assume that a 4" pipe is more then enough, if it isnt your still substantially reducing the amount of makeup air just by having the pipe there which means a warmer room.
No doubt I’m from western Pa too actually. Always grew up in homes with fireplaces/wood stoves fourtnatelyYou are spot on about most homes today. My kids think I am nuts when I point out that most newer homes don't even have a chimney of any sort. If the hearth is missing, I wouldn't want to live there.
Are much is lost if u have a damperOn the other hand, indeed not *all* the heat goes up thru the chimney. At least a small fraction stays in the home when it's burning. So I have to adi that the title is not wrong.
Unfortunately, homes with fireplaces loose that much heat during burning and when not burning (! The latter are the majority of the hours in a year..), that homes with fireplaces use more energy to be heated than homes without fireplaces. See that (peer reviewed) article I mentioned a while back.
Not as much but they are still pretty leakyAre much is lost if u have a damper
And glass
Doors though ? (( when not in use ))
Oh I like classic cars. But I don't choose to drive any of mine if going on long trips or anything. The difference I see is a classic car in most cases will get you there. A fireplace generally won't heat a house to what is considered a comfortable temperature by today's standards.Now if I wanted to commute daily to work in my 1969 Mustang Fastback, I'm sure I'd hear all sorts of arguments against doing so. But I just want to drive it on the weekends. I stand behind what I said in my original post.
302?Now if I wanted to commute daily to work in my 1969 Mustang Fastback, I'm sure I'd hear all sorts of arguments against doing so. But I just want to drive it on the weekends. I stand behind what I said in my original post.
I don't want any misunderstandings! I wish. I was making an analogy with my by big, old stone fireplace with lots of inefficient btus to driving a classic car with lots of inefficient horsepower. They're both fun to have, but not for daily use.302?
No worries! Both make my tail wag, for different reasons 🤣I don't want any misunderstandings! I wish. I was making an analogy with my by big, old stone fireplace with lots of inefficient btus to driving a classic car with lots of inefficient horsepower. They're both fun to have, but not for daily use.
Old Sturbridge Village is set in the 1790s - 1830s, which is during this period.@PaulOinMA Dont forget about the mini ice age in the 1800's
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.