Will soon be ordering an Iron and Oak log splitter. I have a choice of either of these engines. Servicing and warranty dealerships for both engines are within a 1 hour drive. Both engines will be running strong long after I am "pushing up posies" so longevity is not an issue. However, I have a few questions about ease-of-starting:
1) Is one of these engines easier to start than the other? Which is easier?
2) Why is it easier to start; fewer pulls and/or less resistance?
3) The Honda is available with electric start. At my age (70) I am not getting any stronger so might someday wish I had purchased electric start, especially during cold weather splitting. No dealers in my area have either engine for me to try so I am operating with a scarcity of information. Do any of you old timers (or new timers) now wish you had purchased an electric start on your log splitter?
4) The electric start engine w/ battery (motorcycle size) will take up more real estate on the splitter but does anyone know if the extra space interferes with operator's stance, etc?
And to think that just 5 years ago I would have been embarrassed to ask about electric start on a 9 hp engine!
Best wishes,
John_M
1) Is one of these engines easier to start than the other? Which is easier?
2) Why is it easier to start; fewer pulls and/or less resistance?
3) The Honda is available with electric start. At my age (70) I am not getting any stronger so might someday wish I had purchased electric start, especially during cold weather splitting. No dealers in my area have either engine for me to try so I am operating with a scarcity of information. Do any of you old timers (or new timers) now wish you had purchased an electric start on your log splitter?
4) The electric start engine w/ battery (motorcycle size) will take up more real estate on the splitter but does anyone know if the extra space interferes with operator's stance, etc?
And to think that just 5 years ago I would have been embarrassed to ask about electric start on a 9 hp engine!
Best wishes,
John_M