wrenchmonster said:Holy Crap! Very dangerous Dodgerfan! I hate to say it, but that set up is a house fire waiting to happen. Stop burning the wood. If you want gas, then just convert it. If you want wood, then disable the gas line completely. And I mean disable, removed, torn out, etc. How about a nice insert?
-Kevin
Corie said:These logs lighters, as I've mentioned before, were popular a few years back. I don't know of the codes concerning them at this point, but from a safety standpoint they defy logic in my mind.
Mo Heat said:Hi Goose, I'm a northern Louisiana boy myself (Shreveport during the formative years), fishing many a bayou.
I had one of those log lighters in northerm California. Mine was a standard looking, threaded pipe with a cap on one end. May have been black pipe, may have been regular iron water pipe, it was hard to tell. And there was a key to one side of the fireplace opening for turning on the gas. The pipe had holes drilled on opposite sides about every two or three inches as I remember it. But it put out quite a bit of flame. Seemed like a whole lot more than a burner as it wasn't carberated at all like all burners I've seen. So what gas was shot out of there wasn't burned very efficiently. I never thought much about it being dangerous, but I guess it was since it had no auto shut-off valve. I replaced it with a log set that also had no safety valve.
As an interesting note. Both my fireplaces are plumbed for gas here in Missouri. Both had log sets when I moved in. When I had the insert installed, I thought I should remove the gas feed that still penetrated into the fireplace about 3 inches, but the installer told me it was nothing to be concerned about. He reminded me that I'd had open flame and embers in there before the insert and now I had a modest clearance to hot cast iron with a heat shield (the convection shroud) between the two. Seemed reasonable, so I left it alone rather than go to a fair amount of effort to remove it, cap it somewhere outside, and plug the penetration. 3 years and so far, so good.
On a side note, how about putting up a pic of that Italian beauty you ride daily in the "Mug" thread? I'd love to see it. I have always had a fascination with those. I once owned an Italian Harley Davidson back in 1969 or so, that was a nice little machine. The Italians were quite famous for their engine castings back then, and of course their styling, as they still are famous today. Some of the stuff in between casting and styling was kind of iffy back then, but I know the MG was sort of a national, mechanical treasure. Like the Maserati of motorcycles. Well, I guess that would be the Ducati, so maybe there's a better comparison.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.