Battenkiller said:Very nice, Zap!
The problem with bark IDs is that bark can vary considerably among trees, and along a particular tree itself. If you are looking at the whole tree, it may not be that hard, but when someone shows you a split or two, you don't even know from where in the tree it came from. Many of these photo IDs are pretty tough. If I know the wood, I am always sure once it is in my hands, usually just by looking at the wood grain. Weight and smell enter in as well... kinda hard to get those qualities across in a photo.
I thought Sassafras at first, but I think the bark is too furrowed to be Sassafras, I will go with Chestnut Oak. By the way that would be a small Sassafras tree in this part of the woods, 18"-24" dbh is very common around here, hollow and twisted, but common.NH_Wood said:When I looked at the bark, reminded me of a big sassafrass, but I've no idea what interior wood on sassafrass looks like!
webby3650 said:I thought Sassafras at first, but I think the bark is too furrowed to be Sassafras, I will go with Chestnut Oak. By the way that would be a small Sassafras tree in this part of the woods, 18"-24" dbh is very common around here, hollow and twisted, but common.NH_Wood said:When I looked at the bark, reminded me of a big sassafrass, but I've no idea what interior wood on sassafrass looks like!
cuznguido said:It certainly is hard to be certain with the photo only, but even though it looks like chestnut oak, and it might be, I think is is sourwood. Resembles both sassafras and chestnut oak. The wood of sourwood is much lighter than the oak and the grain is far different. If the grain of that wood looks like oak then it probably is chestnut oak. However if the grain is more white with the dark center and the grain is less pronounced, or smoother, the it is likely sourwood. Is that vague enough?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.