wrenchmonster said:
Would you write a letter to your congressional representative or state senator?
If I thought it likely to get anywhere, I'd write a letter urging them NOT to further interfere with the woodburning community. This is NOT a proper function of government, and ammounts to stealing from non-wood burners. If we weren't being forced to pay for all the other special interest axe grinding out there, we would have more than enough to afford to do it without needing the gov't to stick their nose into it and screw things up.
The late Harry Brown, Libertarian Presidential Candidate had a great offer - Would you give up your favorite gov't program if it got rid of several others? I would and do.
The proper function of gov't is to protect it's citizens from crime, and foreign invasion, and that is ALL... I would refer you to Bastiat's "The Law"
Would you be willing to help out with an old stove vs. new stove burning demonstration?
Probably if being done by private parties.
Would you donate money to the cause?
Define "the cause" - If it means to lobby the gov't to steal from others, NO! If it means a private, non-gov't funded charitable activity (such as the donor stove program) possibly, though given my finances, I'd be more inclined to donate labor.
Would you be willing to do free inspections to help educate others about clearance to combustibles, safe installs, etc?
If they were VOLUNTARY on the part of the inspectee, and did NOT involve forcing them to correct any percieved deficiencies. I'd also want to make sure any inspectors got a pretty good amount of training and had sufficient protection against liability if they missed something or otherwise didn't get it perfect.
Would you change in your old stove for a new one if there was a good tax credit involved?
Maybe, but it would depend purely on the economics of the exchange. I would apply the exact same equations and considerations to the idea as I would if there were no credit and the new stove was that much less expensive.
Would you help educate folks about safe forest practices?
Possibly, Though I'm not sure how much such is needed above and beyond what is already being done, or how much good additional activities would do.
Just wanted to get some feedback on the above ideas. I'm going to refrain from making any statements right now. Just wanted to open up the floor and maybe get a good discussion going.
-Kevin
Well, this is where I'm coming from on it. Sorry to sound so negative, but the last thing I want to do with is deal with the gov't as that will reliably make things worse - google "Law of Unintended Consequences"
Private, non-gov't funded activities I can and will support, but I won't have anything to do with it once the gov't steps in, or gov't money appears.
Gooserider