Hopefully our southern brethren will have some good advice here.
I live in an old (for USA) home, with the earliest parts dating to the 1730's, and most of the house being built in 1775. It's a stone house with milled joists and rafters in upper floors, but hand-hewn joists under the first floor (basement ceiling). This appears to be common for the time, as there were many saw mills around the area in the 1770's, but none had carriages long enough to handle the 35 long beams that are my first floor joists.
These first floor joists have a lot of "bounce", and a lot of visible powder post beetle damage, all assumed to be old. In addition, the original floor planking on the first floor has soft areas, presumably old internal termite beetle damage.
A few years back, we switched pest control companies, as the prior company had not been as aggressive as we would like in eliminating the picnic ants that try to invade our kitchen each spring. The new company was great for eliminating the ant problem, but shortly thereafter, their tech's tried convincing us we had termites. All evidence they cited appeared to me to be very old damage, nothing active... but who knows?
So, I invited the senior tech from our prior pest control company out to look at it, as we had a friendly relationship, and I knew he'd give me his un-biased opinion. He looked at all the same evidence, and concluded it was all old damage, nothing active. Of course, I don't know how confident this determination is, it's one person's opinion, against another, looking only at external evidence.
Well, it's been a few years, and the new company has been texting and emailing that they're doing free termite inspections. Likely an attempt to push and sell new services, but also something about which I have a legitimate concern.
So, in the words of Colin Hay, what would Bob do? Is there a reliable and irrefutable method of detection, or of determining whether apparent damage is indeed old or active?
I live in an old (for USA) home, with the earliest parts dating to the 1730's, and most of the house being built in 1775. It's a stone house with milled joists and rafters in upper floors, but hand-hewn joists under the first floor (basement ceiling). This appears to be common for the time, as there were many saw mills around the area in the 1770's, but none had carriages long enough to handle the 35 long beams that are my first floor joists.
These first floor joists have a lot of "bounce", and a lot of visible powder post beetle damage, all assumed to be old. In addition, the original floor planking on the first floor has soft areas, presumably old internal termite beetle damage.
A few years back, we switched pest control companies, as the prior company had not been as aggressive as we would like in eliminating the picnic ants that try to invade our kitchen each spring. The new company was great for eliminating the ant problem, but shortly thereafter, their tech's tried convincing us we had termites. All evidence they cited appeared to me to be very old damage, nothing active... but who knows?
So, I invited the senior tech from our prior pest control company out to look at it, as we had a friendly relationship, and I knew he'd give me his un-biased opinion. He looked at all the same evidence, and concluded it was all old damage, nothing active. Of course, I don't know how confident this determination is, it's one person's opinion, against another, looking only at external evidence.
Well, it's been a few years, and the new company has been texting and emailing that they're doing free termite inspections. Likely an attempt to push and sell new services, but also something about which I have a legitimate concern.
So, in the words of Colin Hay, what would Bob do? Is there a reliable and irrefutable method of detection, or of determining whether apparent damage is indeed old or active?