I'm still mullin' over what to do. I will edit the letter a bit, I've had a couple of folks look at it and make some "critical" suggestions. My take on making the letter "fit" the expected format of corporate America is that I don't want to sound like one of their vendors or an employee challenging a discharge, or someone trying to get a job, or a lawyer discussing a lawsuit, etc.,. I'm simply joe bloe out here that is stating dissatisfaction with their company and pointing out a few minor (to them) losses in sales and the possible loss of customers.
Do I as a customer matter to the TSC coporation...probably not. I'll probably be a fly they shoo away. The only thing that matters to corporate America now is "beans". It's kind of like some locals told me once in Scagway, AK...they would much prefer that the tourists stayed on the cruise ships and just sent the dollars ashore. Same thing with corporate America...they're just concerned about the bottom line, not customer satisfaction. Now, if that customer satisfaction impacts sales and profits then it's another story. My letter is intended to build the sense of frustration and to infer the loss of sales and profits not just with me, but with other TSC customers and ex-customers.
Are the recommendation that I shorten the letter to a more concise form from experience with corporate communications within a corporate environment and between business associates or from customer letters to the company? I agree that a shorter version may be easier to grasp and stating facts in as few words as possible is definitely a good thing. But can the sense of frustration be communicated in fewer words? I'll definitely revisit the letter before mailing, whether it gets much shorter is to be seen.
Alabama has a lot of good people, lots of good mom-n-pop businesses, and some good large businesses. But, just like other states, Alabama has no invisible fences nor birth requirements that keeps jerks from being here. As a rule you'll meet good people who are customer oriented...this is why the "could care less" attitude of these folks at the local TSCs is baffling and frustrating me. It really seems like they've drank some kool-aide...I just can't figure out what flavor.
I believe a good homeowner or light-duty splitter should do me fine. I think the Huskee 22-ton unit would be a good fit. I'll be burning (I'm guesstimating) maybe two cords per winter in my small F3CB. Being as I don't have to build as big of a supply and also that I live in a rural area, I will be able to be somewhat picky (I hope) about what wood I scrounge up. For instance, rather than having to grab everything I come across I can leave the crotches and knots if I want to and take the straighter grained wood. As long as I stay away from that #(&##!! green elm I shouldn't really put much stress on a 22-ton splitter. SoemJust to clarify, I only purchased the first splitter...I was going to purchase the 2nd splitter until I inspected it. I saw nothing in the 2nd splitter that could be attributed to Speeco...it was the *very* poor assembly job at TSC that I noted. I'm looking at other options, one being Speeco...Huskee's parent company.
BrotherBart, I've gotta admit that you've hit close to my train of thought (though my train's normally late and derails a lot). I don't want to come across as part of the corporate world but rather as the common consumer.
Good point about cc'ing the letter to Speeco. I wonder how the Speeco/TSC relationship is. Is TSC one of Speeco's larger customers? I'm sure my letter wouldn't cause a rift, but would Speeco fear losing TSC as a customer or would TSC fear losing Speeco as a supplier? I would be inclined to think that Speeco would be more worried about losing TSC as a customer. From talking with Kevin at Speeco I don't think that Speeco has much input on how dealers like TSC treat customers and respond to customer issues. Do you think that bringing this to the attention of one of TSC's "peers" would cause TSC to puff up due to pride and basically ignore/deny that there is a problem?
Thanks everybody for the feedback, I'm still undecided. I feel that coming across as less than a Yale graduate or a corporate lawyer isn't necessarily bad...after all, it's the truth.
I'll revisit the letter yet again, and see if I can make it a more simple read.
I don't know whether I'll mail it tomorrow or not...maybe Tuesday. Keep the cards and letters comin'.
Thanks!
Ed