Hello!
As many other first time posters I have lurked on this forum for all things woodstove/wood/heat for the past few months as I navigate our new Maine home. We current live in a 2,400sq foot home with forced hot air traditionally but there was an older Kent Tile fire that was in great shape and I’ve been using it to heat the home to pretty good success. It heats the home minus the “fireplace” room on the end of the house where we watch TV. It’s not the most efficient stove and we are looking to be able to watch TV without it being 55 degrees and the use of a heated blanket! For reference my house is long , with the Kent on one side of the house and the purposed new woodstove on an exterior wall existing fireplace on the exact other end of the home. The room also has a wall of windows that we are looking to get insulated blinds for to make them more efficient. Picture also below. The fireplace is 50” by 40” and the hearth is 40” by 100” (in front of the fireplace) fireplace box is 30” deep at the deepest point, and the back wall is 28” wide at its narrowest.
My question has two layers, one about some differences in radiant heat wood stoves and convection wood stoves. In a large room with 14 foot ceilings could I blow myself out of the room with a Jotul Oslo f500 v3 or a Jotul Carrabassett? Or should I think about something like the Hearthstone Mansfield for a gentler heat? The room is about 350 square feet and we ideally would heat the whole home with that woodstove, and use the Kent Tile Fire only to heat the one or two rooms if it got super cold. The Oslo says in my zone it would heat about 1,800 to 2,000ish square feet, and the Mansfield would probably do something like 2,250 assuming? I used the Jotul zone info in the brochure. I want something that is efficient, and can heat the whole home on a mild winter day without the use of the other stove.
The other side to my question is about how convection and radiant heat interact with the fireplace mass. Do they both heat up the fireplace and the fireplace stores the heat? Or would I be able to get the heat moving down to the other end of the house easier with one type of stove over the other?
Thank you in advance for any help. I truly appreciate reading all the posts and info that everyone in this community has provided. It has been a life saver for correct burning technique and stove brand make model information. Also the tv stand isn’t permanent… it’s going to move somewhere else.
Roge
As many other first time posters I have lurked on this forum for all things woodstove/wood/heat for the past few months as I navigate our new Maine home. We current live in a 2,400sq foot home with forced hot air traditionally but there was an older Kent Tile fire that was in great shape and I’ve been using it to heat the home to pretty good success. It heats the home minus the “fireplace” room on the end of the house where we watch TV. It’s not the most efficient stove and we are looking to be able to watch TV without it being 55 degrees and the use of a heated blanket! For reference my house is long , with the Kent on one side of the house and the purposed new woodstove on an exterior wall existing fireplace on the exact other end of the home. The room also has a wall of windows that we are looking to get insulated blinds for to make them more efficient. Picture also below. The fireplace is 50” by 40” and the hearth is 40” by 100” (in front of the fireplace) fireplace box is 30” deep at the deepest point, and the back wall is 28” wide at its narrowest.
My question has two layers, one about some differences in radiant heat wood stoves and convection wood stoves. In a large room with 14 foot ceilings could I blow myself out of the room with a Jotul Oslo f500 v3 or a Jotul Carrabassett? Or should I think about something like the Hearthstone Mansfield for a gentler heat? The room is about 350 square feet and we ideally would heat the whole home with that woodstove, and use the Kent Tile Fire only to heat the one or two rooms if it got super cold. The Oslo says in my zone it would heat about 1,800 to 2,000ish square feet, and the Mansfield would probably do something like 2,250 assuming? I used the Jotul zone info in the brochure. I want something that is efficient, and can heat the whole home on a mild winter day without the use of the other stove.
The other side to my question is about how convection and radiant heat interact with the fireplace mass. Do they both heat up the fireplace and the fireplace stores the heat? Or would I be able to get the heat moving down to the other end of the house easier with one type of stove over the other?
Thank you in advance for any help. I truly appreciate reading all the posts and info that everyone in this community has provided. It has been a life saver for correct burning technique and stove brand make model information. Also the tv stand isn’t permanent… it’s going to move somewhere else.
Roge