Question about moisture meters

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.

polkadottie55

New Member
Jan 14, 2025
12
Victoria BC
I have read on this forum that you should bring wood inside and let it get warm then take it outside and split and measure the moisture content. I don't understand why this is. Also I have measured the moisture in wood that I split today where you can obviously see the difference between dry wood and wood that has been soaked with moisture. The meter reads 21% in the dry area and 21 or 22% in the obviously wet area. However, even in wood that has been seasoned for 2 years or more, I still get moisture readings of 23%. Does wood absorb moisture from the air enough to raise the internal moisture of a wood chunk?
 

Attachments

  • [Hearth.com] Question about moisture meters
    1743465936898907076674881860253.webp
    97.6 KB · Views: 18
  • [Hearth.com] Question about moisture meters
    17434661075375570616847715012198.webp
    74.4 KB · Views: 19
That's a very small piece of wood. Try on a full sized split. Note that .4% difference is nothing. It could vary that much based on how deep the pins are seated into the wood.
 
The reason for the temperature is that the moisture meter measured electric resistance, which is mostly determined by the water content. The resistivity of water (with ions dissolved in it) depends on temperature so the calibration of the meter is done at a specific temperature.
Now if the wood is 55 F instead of 70 F it won't be the end of the world.
But if the water in the wood is near freezing, the difference will be large. The meter will see a high resistance and tell you a low moisture content, but that would be wrong.

If the wood in the two years is regularly exposed to water, and depending on the openness of the grain, it will not dry as much as when it's kept out of the rain
 
Wood species might make for the difference partly. Oak will take far longer to dry than pine for example.
Do you top cover your wood? Note that you should not fully cover your wood- just the top to keep rain off while allowing for moisture to dissipate.
 
The reason for the temperature is that the moisture meter measured electric resistance, which is mostly determined by the water content. The resistivity of water (with ions dissolved in it) depends on temperature so the calibration of the meter is done at a specific temperature.
Now if the wood is 55 F instead of 70 F it won't be the end of the world.
But if the water in the wood is near freezing, the difference will be large. The meter will see a high resistance and tell you a low moisture content, but that would be wrong.

If the wood in the two years is regularly exposed to water, and depending on the openness of the grain, it will not dry as much as when it's kept out of the rain
It is kept out of rain with a roof but no sides so it is exposed to air and we have had a month of lots of rain
 
  • Like
Reactions: begreen
It is kept out of rain with a roof but no sides so it is exposed to air and we have had a month of lots of rain
Sounds like you’re doing all you can do. Wood in the low 20’s is IMO “good enough”. It will be drier than that with some dryer spring and summer weather.
 
I would have expected a large difference between the dry area and the wet area?
With the pins stuck into the wood you are measuring water on a molecular level, I think. If the wet area is from rain then you’re looking at surface moisture. By laying your pins across, not penetrating the wet wood I would think you would get a higher moisture content.