Since I have reserved a Progress for delivery later this year I follow all threads on the stove to see how it is working for owners. Maybe I am being a bit overly critical, but it seem to me, Woodstock should have invested a bit more time in engineering the stove prior to it being sold. I am concerned about problems with slow burns. Woodstock's answer is to engage the cat as soon as possible and turn down the control to near zero but now there are reports of the cat potentially stalling out. The low burn problem sounds like something that can be fixed through engineering and I would expect most likely will be fixed in time. The screen around the cat also seems like a problem as we now hear how difficult it is to get back into place. Hopefully, Wood stock will come up with a fix there, too. I guess Woodstock wanted to get the stove into people's homes as quickly as possible to see how it performs which is why they are offering the low introductory price. Then will make adjustments along the way. The question is was the Progress rushed to market too soon and would a little more time in engineering and development solved these problems? As a side not what would owners most like to see improved with the stove?