E
elkimmeg
Guest
Today I inspected another harman Accentra Pellet stove the 5th this month. So what to a pellet stove inspection?
The pellet stove is sitting on a hearth where ther used to be a central open to two rooms fireplace one side already has A VC winnter warm wood stove and a full liner no block off plate. Mind you this flue liner is 16/16 plenty big The only way I would allow the pellet stove to share the chimney chase is:
#1 the pellet stove be fully lined and termination caps have 1' separation of discharge
#2 the pellet stove be connected to out side air feed ( I felt two competing appliances 18" apart would compete for the combustion air in close proximity)
#3 that damper plate must be sealed.
Permit issued
Inspection issues
#1 6" floor protection required in front of the pellet stove. There is none it is sitting on the very edge of the hearth
#2 the damper plate has enough space between liner pipes to fit a golf ball threw. Plus RTV cannot be used to seal the woode stove space. It looks like the emptied a half dozen RTV caulking tubes. It is everywhere globs on the woodstove pipe globs on the single wall flex pellet vent what a mess globs on the hearth
#3 Fresh air intake is 2 3/8" for a 15 foot run over 15' 3 " is required plus It must be 1' lower than the pelet exhaust which it is but at the same level at the wood stove exit 3 " away
#4 this is where I need advice. According to the manual After Harman is connected to the vent a draft test is required to set up the hi and low settings by measuring 15 volts and adjusting the adjustment screw. I requested that proof of a draft test be present.
before and after setup and adjustments. It is clearly stated in the manual as being required for proper setup. I want proof or documentation it was done . I look at this situation like any final mechanical inspection all, mechanical devices should be up and running properly for final inspection. I fell I am protecting the consumer In HvAC I require flow and balancing reports. To me this is no different. Oil burners shall be draft and effeciency tested What do you think? Is it fair for me to request draft testing proof or documentation?
The pellet stove is sitting on a hearth where ther used to be a central open to two rooms fireplace one side already has A VC winnter warm wood stove and a full liner no block off plate. Mind you this flue liner is 16/16 plenty big The only way I would allow the pellet stove to share the chimney chase is:
#1 the pellet stove be fully lined and termination caps have 1' separation of discharge
#2 the pellet stove be connected to out side air feed ( I felt two competing appliances 18" apart would compete for the combustion air in close proximity)
#3 that damper plate must be sealed.
Permit issued
Inspection issues
#1 6" floor protection required in front of the pellet stove. There is none it is sitting on the very edge of the hearth
#2 the damper plate has enough space between liner pipes to fit a golf ball threw. Plus RTV cannot be used to seal the woode stove space. It looks like the emptied a half dozen RTV caulking tubes. It is everywhere globs on the woodstove pipe globs on the single wall flex pellet vent what a mess globs on the hearth
#3 Fresh air intake is 2 3/8" for a 15 foot run over 15' 3 " is required plus It must be 1' lower than the pelet exhaust which it is but at the same level at the wood stove exit 3 " away
#4 this is where I need advice. According to the manual After Harman is connected to the vent a draft test is required to set up the hi and low settings by measuring 15 volts and adjusting the adjustment screw. I requested that proof of a draft test be present.
before and after setup and adjustments. It is clearly stated in the manual as being required for proper setup. I want proof or documentation it was done . I look at this situation like any final mechanical inspection all, mechanical devices should be up and running properly for final inspection. I fell I am protecting the consumer In HvAC I require flow and balancing reports. To me this is no different. Oil burners shall be draft and effeciency tested What do you think? Is it fair for me to request draft testing proof or documentation?